Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Foo kon tan is just a lousy sme firm. Sme boss where got so generous?

I’ve never even heard of this firm before.

Mid tier only worth it at SM level and above where package is negotiable and they will dangle carrots to poach you. Otherwise u have to deal with bond, **** pay, high turnover... There's a reason why turnover at first 2 years is 3x worse than Big 4. Anyway it's at least 10% lower for associate and senior

FYI nobody in Big4 talks about mid tier, ever.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I’ve never even heard of this firm before.

sounds like ****ing tan. they should change the name to a more atas name instead of one which sounds like vulgarity

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Of course need to see what you can contribute to the firm ?

only behkan people and jhk join lousy SMEs like ****ing Tan and other kacang puteh mid tier firms

Mid tier sinkies > JHK malaysia big 4
any day

How's the attrition at your teams? I thought it'd be lower because nobody tendered after bonus, but suddenly in the past 2 weeks so many people say they're leaving already. Does anyone know if they mentioned we've gotten enough replacements during townhall?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

sounds like ****ing tan. they should change the name to a more atas name instead of one which sounds like vulgarity

It used to be FKT Grant Thornton.

Last time at least got ang moh name to offset the mid tier stigma. Even though working conditions & pay in reality still cui

Now lagi worse totally SME name

Originally Posted by Unregistered

You have to pay 2 years of salary regardless of how long you have worked. So even if you worked 1 month, you have to pay the whole 2 years.

Also, there's a 3-4 year laptop bond where you have to pay them for the laptop so if you leave before that, you have to pay them a few k... if you think big 4 is bad, mid tier takes the cake.

lol some of you mid tier guys really need to look at challenging some of these employment bonds as unenforceable penalty clauses

the scenario you mentioned is very likely an egregious example of an unenforceable penalty

even a bond that requires you to pay 50% x [remaining unserved months of service out of 2 years] is likely to be deemed by a court as a penalty

do any of u mid tier sinkies & jhks have the guts to break the bond and challenge these shiatty mid tier sweatshops in court?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

lol some of you mid tier guys really need to look at challenging some of these employment bonds as unenforceable penalty clauses

the scenario you mentioned is very likely an egregious example of an unenforceable penalty

even a bond that requires you to pay 50% x [remaining unserved months of service out of 2 years] is likely to be deemed by a court as a penalty

do any of u mid tier sinkies & jhks have the guts to break the bond and challenge these shiatty mid tier sweatshops in court?

jhk where got balls? the firms know they want to get SG PR so the jhks won't challenge them