 |
|

03-10-2023, 12:12 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I find my NQ damn wuss. Everything also complain.
|
In house counsels lagi worse. Cheap cheap SAL fees also complain.
|

03-10-2023, 02:03 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Thoughts on Quinn Emanuel setting up shop in SG?
Think some of the more aggressive litigators might be a good fit.
|
which SC will be the first to jump ship
|

03-10-2023, 04:50 AM
|
|
i’m a law student and confused how bonuses (heard is usually a few months of salary?) and front loading thing works? what’s the diff btw legal executive and trainee? when ppl say there is 1k increment with adding of 1 PQE does it depend on work performance or it’s standard for firm to increase ur salary after a year?
anybody care to explain thanks
|

03-10-2023, 08:44 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Trainee 2k per month. NQ 6.8k. The company focuses on tech. Not sure what that means.
|
lawyer pay all peanut wan.chao chao arivan fudder gets S$1.54M Yearly for being figurehead
|

03-10-2023, 09:38 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Thoughts on Quinn Emanuel setting up shop in SG?
Think some of the more aggressive litigators might be a good fit.
|
I hear from good sources that Arvin Lee is applying. Would be best fit.
|

03-10-2023, 02:39 PM
|
|
norton rose
Hi guys, year 3 here. I have a TC offer from Bird & bird TMT, WongP M&A and NRF - Fullbright M&A (have to confirm again).
1. Any advice on which firm to go with?
2. I heard from some seniors that a local firm is better for training, how true is this vis-a-vis intl firm? are local firms really that much different (better)?
3. Does anyone have the rates for Ascendant legal / ATMD?
|

03-10-2023, 02:51 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Hi guys, year 3 here. I have a TC offer from Bird & bird TMT, WongP M&A and NRF - Fullbright M&A (have to confirm again).
1. Any advice on which firm to go with?
2. I heard from some seniors that a local firm is better for training, how true is this vis-a-vis intl firm? are local firms really that much different (better)?
3. Does anyone have the rates for Ascendant legal / ATMD?
|
Pretty sure nrf doesn't offer corp m&a TCs.
Their ptc is basically just disputes, since it's under Ascendant. They have previously only taken int'l arb and Banking rlt trainees as well. So pretty sure your offer from nrf is not legit.
|

03-10-2023, 02:56 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Pretty sure nrf doesn't offer corp m&a TCs.
Their ptc is basically just disputes, since it's under Ascendant. They have previously only taken int'l arb and Banking rlt trainees as well. So pretty sure your offer from nrf is not legit.
|
yup my bad, just checked my application cover letter and it was int arbi. The M&A was for WongP
|

03-10-2023, 06:48 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Hi guys, year 3 here. I have a TC offer from Bird & bird TMT, WongP M&A and NRF - Fullbright M&A (have to confirm again).
1. Any advice on which firm to go with?
2. I heard from some seniors that a local firm is better for training, how true is this vis-a-vis intl firm? are local firms really that much different (better)?
3. Does anyone have the rates for Ascendant legal / ATMD?
|
Definitely not B&B if you got the other two offers - unless you know you 100% want to do TMT or IP. B&B's marketability is very very niche.
I would say WongP M&A is a strong choice, and would prefer that over NRF as NRF Arbitration is alot weaker now after the departure of Darius Chan and KC Lye.
|

03-10-2023, 07:14 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Hi guys, year 3 here. I have a TC offer from Bird & bird TMT, WongP M&A and NRF - Fullbright M&A (have to confirm again).
1. Any advice on which firm to go with?
2. I heard from some seniors that a local firm is better for training, how true is this vis-a-vis intl firm? are local firms really that much different (better)?
3. Does anyone have the rates for Ascendant legal / ATMD?
|
Truth be told, I'd suggest guiding your choices by which kind of law you would like to practice rather than which firm to go.
WongP is good for m&a. Bird & Bird ATMD is known for TMT/IP. NRF is pretty good for int'l arbi.
But they're each different practices of law which require different competencies and personalities.
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|