|
|
13-10-2021, 02:56 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Withers KhattarWong is one of the 4 known sinking ship law firms. Apply at own risk.
|
Think this was true 6-7 years ago but not quite anymore, the colonial rulers have made them clean house internally
|
13-10-2021, 02:58 PM
|
|
Any views on Hogan Lovells (not Lee & Lee)
|
13-10-2021, 03:36 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
corp or ip tc?
|
do you mean IP in a narrow sense or TMT?
TMT sets you up for some of the best inhouse opportunities
|
13-10-2021, 04:24 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Which are the other 3 sinking ships. Lee & Lee?
|
How can.. That one got eternal support from our founding father.. They just don't bother to market themselves because got no reason to.
|
13-10-2021, 05:05 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Think this was true 6-7 years ago but not quite anymore, the colonial rulers have made them clean house internally
|
This is true. If you're in the know, you'd know that Withers has done serious house cleaning in the past few years, ruthlessly dropping the less profitable practice groups and many local partners. Most of the old birds that formed the core KW aren't there any longer.
In fact, I would say WKW is probably more "international" than many of the other JLVs and FLAs around, by virtue of the massive house cleaning. Just that Withers has always been a niche private client and tax London law firm so their peers obviously aren't MC or Silver Circle
Its kinda ironic because what occasioned the KW-RHT split almost 1 decade ago was, to my understanding, a difference in direction of how the firm should internationalize. Both firms are in vastly different places now.
|
13-10-2021, 06:01 PM
|
|
full integration means what exactly? their associates still paid less than the b4?
|
13-10-2021, 06:15 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Which are the other 3 sinking ships. Lee & Lee?
|
Give this man a balloon.
|
13-10-2021, 06:48 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
full integration means what exactly? their associates still paid less than the b4?
|
Lol. Asking the real questions
|
13-10-2021, 07:10 PM
|
|
Which FLA/JLV can be considered “international”?
|
13-10-2021, 07:54 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Which FLA/JLV can be considered “international”?
|
If you're talking about people paying >big4, quite a few smaller FLA/JLVs do indeed pay above big4, like my firm. However, the work that we do is (admittedly) not at the level you expect from int firms.
Mostly, the int firm have their own payscale/track, and the local firm pays based on their size. For example, Ashurst pays int rates but ADT law does not pay anything close.
There are only a few "pay int, do int work" firms, such as CC/Cavenagh Law, and "pay half-way int rates" firms like BM.
Most of the truly international firms in SG just do not bother with a local partner and get a foreign law license instead or just use the local partner to get the appropriate FLA/JLV license.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|