 |
|
02-07-2021, 04:53 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Wong Pee lah
So basic u dunch noe?
|
Drew duh.
Drew for disputes
|
02-07-2021, 07:24 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Which is the best B4 for construction?
|
Whoin right mind would want to do construction law?
|
02-07-2021, 07:56 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Whoin right mind would want to do construction law?
|
Someone who isn't a poser on the internet
|
02-07-2021, 09:28 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Which is the best B4 for construction?
|
Eldan law. Best construction law firm. Puts the big4s to shame all the time
|
02-07-2021, 10:12 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Whoin right mind would want to do construction law?
|
actually construction law got the most zhar bor lawyers.
|
02-07-2021, 11:01 PM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
actually construction law got the most zhar bor lawyers.
|
One particular b4 construction practice I heard
Always hire girls.
|
03-07-2021, 01:55 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
actually construction law got the most zhar bor lawyers.
|
why are there so many girls in law anyway?
|
03-07-2021, 02:58 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Wong Pee lah
So basic u dunch noe?
|
I'm in construction disputes. It's Wongp's style to just throw in as much **** as they can (whether relevant or not) and see what sticks.... They have a revolving door of associates just anyhow doing SOPA/construction cases in a copy-paste style. That's why the attrition rate is really high. So although I understand they technically are "strong" in construction, they are highly overrated, nobody there is learning anything useful, assocs are just treated as warm bodies.
|
03-07-2021, 03:20 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
why are there so many girls in law anyway?
|
The reasons should be quite obvious.
Law is a non-STEM profession and females don't like to study STEM. Aptitude or not, I'm not going to open that can of worms...
It's a pseudo-social science, which is more towards female inclinations. But it's also slightly more competitive and prestigious to enter than your run-of-the-mill arts/social science/business courses. Hence, it attracts the studious, nerdy girls from better JCs or who did better in A levels.
At the academic and junior practice level, law rewards being studious, meticulous, and putting your head down quietly and doing the work. Females excel in this because they are detail-oriented and fussy about minute things, and are very good at following pre-planned procedures and SOPs to the letter.
The more incisive question to ask is why you don't see females as top level litigators or many EPs. Aside from the obvious family burdens stereotype, at the senior level, the skillsets required for law are more towards the rainmaking size (schmoozing with clients) and seeing the big picture and problem solving in creative ways and being thick skinned (for litigation).
|
03-07-2021, 09:44 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I'm in construction disputes. It's Wongp's style to just throw in as much **** as they can (whether relevant or not) and see what sticks.... They have a revolving door of associates just anyhow doing SOPA/construction cases in a copy-paste style. That's why the attrition rate is really high. So although I understand they technically are "strong" in construction, they are highly overrated, nobody there is learning anything useful, assocs are just treated as warm bodies.
|
So what is the proper way of doing construction law?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
