IMDA (under MCI)

IMDA still has relevance meh?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

"Established" D & DDs are those who hold supervisory positions for a relatively long period of time, before even the ascension of LCH. These are the bosses/leaders who demonstrated some semblance of competency. If I were to throw out a name, an example would be June Koh. As toxic and horrible she was in her leadership, she managed to get herself hired at another company through her competencies.

Another worth mentioning is the marketing and comms division. The current batch of D & DDs are quite recent, only come onboard imda during LCH's reign (read: majority of their predecessors most likely left because they ain't fans of LCH's mediocre leadership). It doesn't make sense for the previous batch of D & DDs to resign if they haven't secured a job first. It's probably easier for them to get hired at another place as marketing and comms ain't subjected to the ill effects of incompetent senior leadership that threaten their own professional competence.

this LCH is soooo bad, how did he even get chosen to be scholar

Originally Posted by ExCivilServeant

Nah, DG. That team that try to achieve digital inclusivity. What screw up EEE if they expect employees to gave favorable review. Heard that that person is now ostricisced by the extended team

There are also cases of "forcing" competent staff to early retirement. They ask a staff to take what Psychometric Test, and then told her/him that the scores is to requirement. I hope Karma will strike that HR/TC team one day, really damn evil.

What is TC?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

While I sympathise with the stories in this forum, I can't help but think you are another one of those people who only know how to blame others for your own lack of competency. Are you sure you can get the job if you were not from IMDA?

IMDA is a big stain on your resume. I mentioned during a few interviews, and all the interviewers openly ditch IMDA, calling it useless and ppl coming out from that agency are crap. DO NOT STAIN YOUR RESUME

Originally Posted by ExCivilServeant

Yeap, the initiator is that AO also,an old faggot

DG is that digital for life lead

s://.imda.gov.sg/about-imda/who-we-are/our-team/our-senior-management/strategic-planning-digital-readiness

this fellow got many titles

Mr Douglas Goh
Director, SG Digital Office
Director, Digital Engagement & Adoption
Director, Asia Tech Programme Office
Digital Readiness Cluster

close down IMDA sua

Originally Posted by Unregistered

This shows the incompetency of the HR director

her 2 subordinates, CC and VO are also useless

this is an extremely dirty HR team

Originally Posted by Unregistered

IMDA is a big stain on your resume. I mentioned during a few interviews, and all the interviewers openly ditch IMDA, calling it useless and ppl coming out from that agency are crap. DO NOT STAIN YOUR RESUME

that's why so many people quit after just a few months, they rather make it seem like a career gap than add IMDA on their resume

hahah u all talk kok so much but mostly all still working in IMDA LOL havent leave.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

"Established" D & DDs are those who hold supervisory positions for a relatively long period of time, before even the ascension of LCH. These are the bosses/leaders who demonstrated some semblance of competency. If I were to throw out a name, an example would be June Koh. As toxic and horrible she was in her leadership, she managed to get herself hired at another company through her competencies.

Another worth mentioning is the marketing and comms division. The current batch of D & DDs are quite recent, only come onboard imda during LCH's reign (read: majority of their predecessors most likely left because they ain't fans of LCH's mediocre leadership). It doesn't make sense for the previous batch of D & DDs to resign if they haven't secured a job first. It's probably easier for them to get hired at another place as marketing and comms ain't subjected to the ill effects of incompetent senior leadership that threaten their own professional competence.

LCH is the worst scholar I ever encountered in gov