Lawyer Salary

Nobody was harmed by a few photos. Why so harsh on him?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Nobody was harmed by a few photos. Why so harsh on him?

"nobody"? did you even bother to read her victim impact statement? people like you are the ones who enable creeps like him

Originally Posted by Unregistered

"nobody"? did you even bother to read her victim impact statement? people like you are the ones who enable creeps like him

Relax la nobody died and not a single drop of blood was spilled. Calm ur tits u feminist scum.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Academia is reserved for top 1-5% of grads.
JLC is reserved for top 10% of grads (your FCH).
Baker/CC in the past used to accept FCH as trainees, but heard standards have lowered recently, so 2:1-2:2 also can.
Practice is essentially open to anyone including the 2:2s.
The poster asked what his choices were as a FCH from NUS.
Academia in SG is prestigious given the high bar and prestige surrounding it (excluding anomalous situations).

Heard now academia not prestigious liao. At one local university, there seems to be a mass exodus of juniors.

[2022] SGHC 114

In our judgment, V’s account of the respondent’s “emotional blackmail”, including
claiming that if V proceeded against him it would “hurt his mother who was
already very sick”

(c) On 2 October 2020 at around 11.45am, one Chan Lai Yin
(“Chan”), a process server from Allen & Gledhill, visited the Premises
to try to serve a copy of the documents that the Law Society intended to
rely on in the hearing before the DT. The respondent was not present at
the Premises. Instead, an elderly man and woman answered the door and informed Chan that they were the respondent’s parents. They told Chan
that the respondent was “outstationed” [sic], and that they did not know
when he would return to Singapore. The respondent’s mother accepted
the documents but refused to sign the acknowledgement because the
respondent’s father did not allow her to do so.


32 On 18 August 2021 at around 7.30pm, Allen & Gledhill again attempted
to serve the Documents on the respondent at the Premises. The process server,
one Lim Puay Hock (“Lim”), rang the doorbell at the Premises. The door was
opened by an elderly Chinese man who, upon seeing Lim, abruptly slammed
the door shut without saying anything.
In a subsequent affidavit filed on 3 September 2021, Lim confirmed, based on
photographs in Chan’s affidavit, that the elderly Chinese man who slammed the
door shut was the same man Chan had encountered and who had identified
himself to Chan as the respondent’s father.

Lol so Lawsoc asked for 3.5-5 year suspension but C3J struck off Mr Drew & Napier lawyer instead?

Walkover for Lawsoc's prosecuting counsel from A&G. Those 2 counsels must be feeling damn shiok. Don't need to do reply subs and still got more than they asked for.

Any thoughts?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Any thoughts?

He should have turned up to face the music.
He would have gotten a lighter sentence, and his name would still be redacted.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

[2022] SGHC 114

In our judgment, V’s account of the respondent’s “emotional blackmail”, including
claiming that if V proceeded against him it would “hurt his mother who was
already very sick”

(c) On 2 October 2020 at around 11.45am, one Chan Lai Yin
(“Chan”), a process server from Allen & Gledhill, visited the Premises
to try to serve a copy of the documents that the Law Society intended to
rely on in the hearing before the DT. The respondent was not present at
the Premises. Instead, an elderly man and woman answered the door and informed Chan that they were the respondent’s parents. They told Chan
that the respondent was “outstationed” [sic], and that they did not know
when he would return to Singapore. The respondent’s mother accepted
the documents but refused to sign the acknowledgement because the
respondent’s father did not allow her to do so.


32 On 18 August 2021 at around 7.30pm, Allen & Gledhill again attempted
to serve the Documents on the respondent at the Premises. The process server,
one Lim Puay Hock (“Lim”), rang the doorbell at the Premises. The door was
opened by an elderly Chinese man who, upon seeing Lim, abruptly slammed
the door shut without saying anything.
In a subsequent affidavit filed on 3 September 2021, Lim confirmed, based on
photographs in Chan’s affidavit, that the elderly Chinese man who slammed the
door shut was the same man Chan had encountered and who had identified
himself to Chan as the respondent’s father.

Drew Napier guy's parents refused to sign the acknowledgement, but didn't refuse Chan's phototaking for her affidavit lol

This family must be really into photography

Is the girl good looking?