|
|
05-12-2019, 02:47 PM
|
|
margin of error for part b?
i deserve to fail- ran out of time today and barely answered the last question. even though the weight was clearly in the first question which i answered (and the second ques), what are my odds of passing?
anyone messed up part b exams and still passed?
|
06-12-2019, 09:12 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
i deserve to fail- ran out of time today and barely answered the last question. even though the weight was clearly in the first question which i answered (and the second ques), what are my odds of passing?
anyone messed up part b exams and still passed?
|
Is this family law?
|
06-12-2019, 01:11 PM
|
|
Part B is a test of your typing/writing speed
|
07-12-2019, 12:37 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Is this family law?
|
Yes. I guess it isnt a good sign then?
|
07-12-2019, 12:46 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 36
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
You sure enjoy entertaining yourself here.
Can you post the actual JD and application page?
|
I'm not here to entertain myself - I'm here to find myself a colleague. I hardly ever drop by this forum, and when I do its for a specific purpose. I see no compelling need to prove my identity to you.
To those of you who dropped me PMs, sorry I've taken a while to get back as I've been busy over the past week and this search slipped my mind. I will reply your PMs shortly.
|
07-12-2019, 01:52 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
i deserve to fail- ran out of time today and barely answered the last question. even though the weight was clearly in the first question which i answered (and the second ques), what are my odds of passing?
anyone messed up part b exams and still passed?
|
Hi don’t worry too much about it. I took the exams last year.
I took ACP which required us to answer all 4 questions and to pass all 4 questions.
However I read a question wrongly and answered it completely wrongly - it was dramatically bad - my friends thought I had a good chance to fail that also.
Thought I would fail, but I still passed.
The examiners would take a look at the entirely of the paper before they decide whether to fail you. If you have shown competence in ur other questions , they will likely not fail you. In any case, from what I understand, the failing of a candidate is a multi stage process. The first marker would have to fail you first, and then to the subject coordinator, and then to the Part B head (at least this is what I heard - can’t be determinatively verified).
So don’t be overly worried.
|
07-12-2019, 02:46 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
i deserve to fail- ran out of time today and barely answered the last question. even though the weight was clearly in the first question which i answered (and the second ques), what are my odds of passing?
anyone messed up part b exams and still passed?
|
The passing rate for Part B, after supp exams, is >95%. If you have written/typed your answer in point form for the questions you can't complete, you are likely to pass. After all, examiners mark based on you showing what you know. And they are human, they know it is impossible for any candidate to complete any paper within 2 hours with a beautifully structured analytical essay
|
11-12-2019, 12:03 AM
|
|
Hi, what do people know about KSCGP? Heard it's one of the least toxic law firms paying very competitive rates, any past trainees? What is the retention rate like? Is it too late to apply now for Jan 2020 TC?
|
12-12-2019, 01:59 AM
|
|
Drew and Napier
Hey can someone reveal name of the SMU LAW SUMMA CUM LAUDE associate who took a picture of his colleague in her bra and panties?
Secondly, was the female associate ALREADY in her undergarments when the pic was taken? Or did the accused DELIBERATELY go into the toilet to peep at her???
|
12-12-2019, 02:07 AM
|
|
Appeal to elect a Young Associate as President of the Law Society
Time to oust these old men stuck in the yesteryears and put them in their place. We now have the numbers. Junior lawyers now make up the bulk of the profession. Heard a rumour that MOM supports the view that training contracts and trainees be given rights under the employment act but Law Soc has opposed this. Can someone verify?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|