Lawyer Salary

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Frankly these trolls are childish. Just putting out unsubstantiated rubbish about baker disputes and skirtkng the issues. No one has ever detailed anything bad apart from making sweeping statements. Cowards.

The work environment is toxic passing off as "friendly", the few good assocs you manage to get have left or are in the process of doing so (if you're in baker disputes you know which ones I'm referring to), there are many top liti students who reject baker consistently for b4 disputes team to the point where your TCs are usually not first-round picks.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The work environment is toxic passing off as "friendly", the few good assocs you manage to get have left or are in the process of doing so (if you're in baker disputes you know which ones I'm referring to), there are many top liti students who reject baker consistently for b4 disputes team to the point where your TCs are usually not first-round picks.

You don't even make an iota of sense. How does baker disputes even pass off as friendly and be toxic. Nd even if assocs come n go the partners have been there for a long time and they r good but you conveniently ignore that. Telling that you are posting as a junior disgruntled associate.

Again another sweeping childish statement.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The work environment is toxic passing off as "friendly", the few good assocs you manage to get have left or are in the process of doing so (if you're in baker disputes you know which ones I'm referring to), there are many top liti students who reject baker consistently for b4 disputes team to the point where your TCs are usually not first-round picks.

And what the heck is a top liti student

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The work environment is toxic passing off as "friendly", the few good assocs you manage to get have left or are in the process of doing so (if you're in baker disputes you know which ones I'm referring to), there are many top liti students who reject baker consistently for b4 disputes team to the point where your TCs are usually not first-round picks.

Really lame. Friendly also get accused of being toxic.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The work environment is toxic passing off as "friendly", the few good assocs you manage to get have left or are in the process of doing so (if you're in baker disputes you know which ones I'm referring to), there are many top liti students who reject baker consistently for b4 disputes team to the point where your TCs are usually not first-round picks.

As a current student in the midst of the TC application window, it seems like most, if not all, of the DLers have chosen not to train at Baker. The main issue is that their marginally higher starting pay isn't attractive enough to compensate for the fact that they are nowhere near the best, especially for disputes. How to have confidence in their training when they are a Band 4 department for both domestic litigation and international arbitration? The $3K advantage over R&T, Drew or WP isn't worth it, unless you need money quickly. The DLers would rather slog it out at those B4 firms in the short run and then transfer to a MC or WS firm, or apply to CC/JLC if they are particularly outstanding.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Frankly these trolls are childish. Just putting out unsubstantiated rubbish about baker disputes and skirtkng the issues. No one has ever detailed anything bad apart from making sweeping statements. Cowards.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

The work environment is toxic passing off as "friendly", the few good assocs you manage to get have left or are in the process of doing so (if you're in baker disputes you know which ones I'm referring to), there are many top liti students who reject baker consistently for b4 disputes team to the point where your TCs are usually not first-round picks.

As a current student in the midst of the TC application window, it seems like most, if not all, of the DLers have chosen not to train at Baker. The main issue is that their marginally higher starting pay isn't attractive enough to compensate for the fact that they are nowhere near the best, especially for disputes. How to have confidence in their training when they are a Band 4 department for both domestic litigation and international arbitration? The $3K advantage over R&T, Drew or WP isn't worth it, unless you need money quickly. The DLers would rather slog it out at those B4 firms in the short run and then transfer to a MC or WS firm, or apply to CC/JLC if they are particularly outstanding.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

As a current student in the midst of the TC application window, it seems like most, if not all, of the DLers have chosen not to train at Baker. The main issue is that their marginally higher starting pay isn't attractive enough to compensate for the fact that they are nowhere near the best, especially for disputes. How to have confidence in their training when they are a Band 4 department for both domestic litigation and international arbitration? The $3K advantage over R&T, Drew or WP isn't worth it, unless you need money quickly. The DLers would rather slog it out at those B4 firms in the short run and then transfer to a MC or WS firm, or apply to CC/JLC if they are particularly outstanding.

This is misleading and grossly unfair. You can't just take rankings as a whole and skew them to your foregone conclusion. The facts are that nandakumar ponniya team in baker for construction disputes and celeste ang team in employment disputes in baker are band 1 or 2.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Whenever I see female lawyers walk past me in the office, I imagine ****ing them, I also imagine that their pussies are unshaven and super hairy, although they may be well groomed on the outside. After that I imagine them peeing on me, with their dribble splashing all over, that hissing sound is super hot when they need to go urgently after a few hours of intense drafting!!!

You are truly disgusting

Originally Posted by Unregistered

This is misleading and grossly unfair. You can't just take rankings as a whole and skew them to your foregone conclusion. The facts are that nandakumar ponniya team in baker for construction disputes and celeste ang team in employment disputes in baker are band 1 or 2.

how about the others

Originally Posted by Unregistered

how about the others

As mentioned in other posts they have a new patner who has brought in alot of restructuring latter's all high profile