|
|
13-09-2021, 09:55 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
This is misleading and grossly unfair. You can't just take rankings as a whole and skew them to your foregone conclusion. The facts are that nandakumar ponniya team in baker for construction disputes and celeste ang team in employment disputes in baker are band 1 or 2.
|
You are free to disagree. I am stating an opinion that I believe to be prevalent amongst my batchmates. You can confirm this for yourself by asking W from HR how many DLers declined to train at your disputes team. I myself interned at Baker and decided not to go there.
If you prefer to cherry pick on teams, there are other more renowned and higher-ranked teams for construction disputes: Andrea Yeap SC and Ng Kim Beng at R&T; Christopher Chuah and Tay Peng Cheng at WP; Mohan Pilay at PM MPillay; Eugene Tan from Clyde.
The same applies for employment: Murali Pillai SC and Jonathan Yuen at R&T; Kelvin Tan at Drew; Sanjiv Rajan at A&G.
No matter how you flip the coin, the consistent conclusion is that you are better off (1) training at one of the B4s and then making partner or lateralling into a 'real' international firm or (2) training at a 'real' international firm or enrolling into the JLC programme.
|
13-09-2021, 10:00 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
This is misleading and grossly unfair. You can't just take rankings as a whole and skew them to your foregone conclusion. The facts are that nandakumar ponniya team in baker for construction disputes and celeste ang team in employment disputes in baker are band 1 or 2.
|
You are free to disagree. I am stating an opinion that I believe to be prevalent amongst my batchmates. You can confirm this for yourself by asking W from HR how many DLers declined to train at your disputes team. I myself interned at Baker and decided not to go there. Even the representative from Baker's disputes team was on the defensive during the practice group Q&A session.
If you prefer to cherry pick on teams and ignore the overall rankings, there are other more renowned and higher-ranked teams for construction disputes: Andrea Yeap SC and Ng Kim Beng at R&T; Christopher Chuah and Tay Peng Cheng at WP; Mohan Pilay at PM MPillay; Eugene Tan from Clyde.
The same applies for employment: Murali Pillai SC and Jonathan Yuen at R&T; Kelvin Tan at Drew; Sanjiv Rajan at A&G.
No matter how you flip the coin, the consistent conclusion is that you are better off (1) training at one of the B4s and then making partner or lateralling into a 'real' international firm or (2) training at a 'real' international firm or enrolling into the JLC programme. The other firms also offer far more opportunities to work with top lawyers handling other kinds of commercial disputes.
|
13-09-2021, 10:04 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
You are free to disagree. I am stating an opinion that I believe to be prevalent amongst my batchmates. You can confirm this for yourself by asking W from HR how many DLers declined to train at your disputes team. I myself interned at Baker and decided not to go there. Even the representative from Baker's disputes team was on the defensive during the practice group Q&A session.
If you prefer to cherry pick on teams and ignore the overall rankings, there are other more renowned and higher-ranked teams for construction disputes: Andrea Yeap SC and Ng Kim Beng at R&T; Christopher Chuah and Tay Peng Cheng at WP; Mohan Pilay at PM MPillay; Eugene Tan from Clyde.
The same applies for employment: Murali Pillai SC and Jonathan Yuen at R&T; Kelvin Tan at Drew; Sanjiv Rajan at A&G.
No matter how you flip the coin, the consistent conclusion is that you are better off (1) training at one of the B4s and then making partner or lateralling into a 'real' international firm or (2) training at a 'real' international firm or enrolling into the JLC programme. The other firms also offer far more opportunities to work with top lawyers handling other kinds of commercial disputes.
|
interesting - heard a few rejected baker disputes recently for better prospects
|
13-09-2021, 10:22 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
You are free to disagree. I am stating an opinion that I believe to be prevalent amongst my batchmates. You can confirm this for yourself by asking W from HR how many DLers declined to train at your disputes team. I myself interned at Baker and decided not to go there. Even the representative from Baker's disputes team was on the defensive during the practice group Q&A session.
If you prefer to cherry pick on teams and ignore the overall rankings, there are other more renowned and higher-ranked teams for construction disputes: Andrea Yeap SC and Ng Kim Beng at R&T; Christopher Chuah and Tay Peng Cheng at WP; Mohan Pilay at PM MPillay; Eugene Tan from Clyde.
The same applies for employment: Murali Pillai SC and Jonathan Yuen at R&T; Kelvin Tan at Drew; Sanjiv Rajan at A&G.
No matter how you flip the coin, the consistent conclusion is that you are better off (1) training at one of the B4s and then making partner or lateralling into a 'real' international firm or (2) training at a 'real' international firm or enrolling into the JLC programme. The other firms also offer far more opportunities to work with top lawyers handling other kinds of commercial disputes.
|
You mean Weena Soh from HR?
Who is the defensive disputes representative?
Primary School English Grammar and Vocabulary Drills
SG Bus Timing App - the best bus app - available on iOS and Android
Bursa Stocks [Android] App - check latest share prices on the go
SGX Stocks [Android] App - check latest share prices on the go
SGX Stocks [iPad] app | SGX Stocks [iPhone] app
|
13-09-2021, 10:27 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
The work environment is toxic passing off as "friendly", the few good assocs you manage to get have left or are in the process of doing so (if you're in baker disputes you know which ones I'm referring to), there are many top liti students who reject baker consistently for b4 disputes team to the point where your TCs are usually not first-round picks.
|
Why toxic? Can pls elaborate?
|
13-09-2021, 10:32 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
As mentioned in other posts they have a new patner who has brought in alot of restructuring latter's all high profile
|
Only restructuring?
|
13-09-2021, 10:35 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Only restructuring?
|
Amongst others if that's what you are fishing for. Yes he's that great.
|
13-09-2021, 10:40 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Amongst others if that's what you are fishing for. Yes he's that great.
|
Who is great?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|