Lawyer Salary - Page 1232 - Salary.sg Forums
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Lawyer Salary

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #12311 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2021, 07:29 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Part A used to be 90% pass rate in 2010-2014. Same as Part B.

In fact, if Part A and local syllabus is equivalent, those who get 2.2s in local universities should be barred from practice until they can at least get a 2.1 standard.

Part B should be marked on a hidden bell curve to maintain a low pass rate. Problem solved. Parity and if you really suck whichever school you come from you can't practise.

Somehow, although Part A was made to gradually have a 30% pass rate (anecdotal), Part B retained its 90% pass rate until 2021. Lucky they are raising the standards of BOTH.
Spoken like a true overseas graduate who doesn't understand the rigour of the local law courses. Part A is NOT equivalent to local law standards. It is equivalent in breadth but nowhere near in depth, and is in fact a watered down crash-course on Singapore law that anybody who bothers to take 2-3 weeks before the papers to study, can and should pass on the first go.

Second lower local law school grads are easily equivalent to 2.1s from the UK. Local law school graduates who are third class honours can't practice and they're already a step up from UK 2:2s, who are not graded on a curve.

Reply With Quote
  #12312 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2021, 08:05 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why were the supp papers for part a removed but still around for part b?

Reply With Quote
  #12313 (permalink)  
Old 19-06-2021, 10:28 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
As they should. So sick of the poor standards of these foreign uni grads. Note that my gripe is with the foreign grads, not the unis themselves. Unfortunately, the majority of those Singaporean students that study in these schools just don't have what it takes to practice at the required level.

In my view, foreign unis should be limited to Oxbridge, LSE, UCL, Melbourne, Sydney and UNSW, and the US schools. Full stop. Sick of having to babysit subpar NQs.
LoL at the addition of schools from a certain country here.

Reply With Quote
  #12314 (permalink)  
Old 20-06-2021, 03:26 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Spoken like a true overseas graduate who doesn't understand the rigour of the local law courses. Part A is NOT equivalent to local law standards. It is equivalent in breadth but nowhere near in depth, and is in fact a watered down crash-course on Singapore law that anybody who bothers to take 2-3 weeks before the papers to study, can and should pass on the first go.

Second lower local law school grads are easily equivalent to 2.1s from the UK. Local law school graduates who are third class honours can't practice and they're already a step up from UK 2:2s, who are not graded on a curve.
I agree with the general tenor of your post. The hate is somewhat warranted.

But don't BS pls. You say I don't understand the "rigour" of local unis. But neither can you understand the "rigour" of Part A. You never took Part A. Don't provide a dumb comparison based on experience on one end and one end only.

Second paragraph - generally true. However, that being said, there must be a cut-off for reasons of parity. Where you would like to draw a line is really up to you. It's an objection from fairness and every single lawyer must be subject to the same exam.

Even if you say, for instance, every single UK grad must take NUS modules marked on a bell curve, that would be palatable. Don't need to make it a "Bar exam".

The lack of parity is disappointing and, to say the least, rigged.


Primary School English Grammar and Vocabulary Drills
Primary School English Grammar and Vocabulary Drills


SG Bus Timing App
SG Bus Timing App - the best bus app - available on iOS and Android


SGX Stocks Android App - check share prices
SGX Stocks [Android] App - check latest share prices on the go


SGX Stocks for iPad - check latest Singapore share prices
SGX Stocks [iPad] app
| SGX Stocks [iPhone] app
Reply With Quote
  #12315 (permalink)  
Old 20-06-2021, 03:35 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I agree with the general tenor of your post. The hate is somewhat warranted.

But don't BS pls. You say I don't understand the "rigour" of local unis. But neither can you understand the "rigour" of Part A. You never took Part A. Don't provide a dumb comparison based on experience on one end and one end only.

Second paragraph - generally true. However, that being said, there must be a cut-off for reasons of parity. Where you would like to draw a line is really up to you. It's an objection from fairness and every single lawyer must be subject to the same exam.

Even if you say, for instance, every single UK grad must take NUS modules marked on a bell curve, that would be palatable. Don't need to make it a "Bar exam".

The lack of parity is disappointing and, to say the least, rigged.
I also agree because there are some foreign schools that print degrees. We know who the culprits are. No need to keep publicising. A 2.2 from NUS may even be better than a FCH from some places.

But the objection is parity. It is not school-shitting. I really do not give a **** about the vitirol that comes out of entitled local YPs.

To have parity:

1. Either make all foreign grads take the first part of the Bar based on NUS papers marked on a bell curve

2. Make NUS modules which are tested in Part A marked on a pass-fail-distinction basis.

It is rubbish to categorise each person based on perceptions about school and reputation.

You advocate merit. So there isn't any reason for a lack of parity - even your perception about reputation, if true, does not apply to every single person from a particular school. Many duds around in every school.
Reply With Quote
  #12316 (permalink)  
Old 20-06-2021, 03:38 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I also agree because there are some foreign schools that print degrees. We know who the culprits are. No need to keep publicising. A 2.2 from NUS may even be better than a FCH from some places.

But the objection is parity. It is not school-shitting. I really do not give a **** about the vitirol that comes out of entitled local YPs.

To have parity:

1. Either make all foreign grads take the first part of the Bar based on NUS papers marked on a bell curve

2. Make NUS modules which are tested in Part A marked on a pass-fail-distinction basis.

It is rubbish to categorise each person based on perceptions about school and reputation.

You advocate merit. So there isn't any reason for a lack of parity - even your perception about reputation, if true, does not apply to every single person from a particular school. Many duds around in every school.
My next question is also this: if you advocate merit why should the people in every school who only party and dud around be able to rely on the perception about their school, which is formed usually from the brilliant ones?
Reply With Quote

  #12317 (permalink)  
Old 20-06-2021, 10:28 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
LoL at the addition of schools from a certain country here.
Delta variant country?
Reply With Quote
  #12318 (permalink)  
Old 20-06-2021, 11:01 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Wtf guys. Nobody cares about what tom dick harry on a forum thinks is aptitude.

Unpopular take: Curve and mandated fail rates do not weed out ineptitude. They merely breed competitiveness. The selectivity of such systems is a byproduct. There’s no reason not to grant a professional qualification for everyone who meets the necessary standards.

Students just need to make sure they study for the bar. Yes you’re out if school now but you have one (or two) more exam(s) to go for before you can practice. Now is not the time to let up.

Now can the kids please take your vitriol elsewhere, and just ask salary (or practise) related questions?
Reply With Quote
  #12319 (permalink)  
Old 20-06-2021, 12:23 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

[QUOTE=Unregistered;174849]Wtf guys. Nobody cares about what tom dick harry on a forum thinks is aptitude.

Unpopular take: Curve and mandated fail rates do
The current system is regressive since it purports to produce the SAME STANDARD of lawyers based on different objectives and standards (of local exams and Part A).

The starting point should be the same and not vary according to different subsections of the legal profession. You want to produce an NUS 2.1 standard across the board, so be it. All foreign grads to be marked on NUS exams on a bell curve.

This puts an end to the entire universe of vitirol which has been expounded in the past 1000 pages. If someone cannot meet an NUS 2.1 standard, he's out. No need to compare schools. If someone is from a bad school but meets an NUS 2.1 standard, he's worthy of being called regardless of school.

If you say NUS students should have jobs because of the academic rigour in NUS, I'm sure you will support parity. It will remove everyone's sense of entitlement. Don't give me BS like your school better than his school. Put your money where your mouth is.

Members of the public are relying on the rigour of examinations to ensure certain minimum standards. The ends justify the means (of imposing such parity).
Reply With Quote
  #12320 (permalink)  
Old 20-06-2021, 02:30 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Unpopular take: Curve and mandated fail rates do
The current system is regressive since it purports to produce the SAME STANDARD of lawyers based on different objectives and standards (of local exams and Part A).

The starting point should be the same and not vary according to different subsections of the legal profession. You want to produce an NUS 2.1 standard across the board, so be it. All foreign grads to be marked on NUS exams on a bell curve.

This puts an end to the entire universe of vitirol which has been expounded in the past 1000 pages. If someone cannot meet an NUS 2.1 standard, he's out. No need to compare schools. If someone is from a bad school but meets an NUS 2.1 standard, he's worthy of being called regardless of school.

If you say NUS students should have jobs because of the academic rigour in NUS, I'm sure you will support parity. It will remove everyone's sense of entitlement. Don't give me BS like your school better than his school. Put your money where your mouth is.

Members of the public are relying on the rigour of examinations to ensure certain minimum standards. The ends justify the means (of imposing such parity).
why set to the nus standard? "practice" on its own has demands above and beyond that of what is taught in nus, have a higher common bar

but anyway, agree with your basic premise
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
advocate, law, lawyer, legal, solicitor

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
From Lawyer Insider: Life is Glamorous but Unsatisfying Salary.sg Income and Jobs 31 15-01-2018 12:40 PM

» 30 Recent Threads
How is life as a doctor in... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
2,912 Replies, 1,460,901 Views
Anyone jobless for a long time... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,103 Replies, 1,329,795 Views
Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,386 Replies, 1,391,233 Views
Civil Svc/ Statboard - Typical... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,952 Replies, 1,810,279 Views
If you can't find a company here... ( 1 2 3)
23 Replies, 2,672 Views
Relocation to the US or stay in SG? ( 1 2 3)
21 Replies, 855 Views
Queries about Cpib application ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,285 Replies, 651,923 Views
Compare civil service salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
12,727 Replies, 7,485,876 Views
Getting MBA worth? ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
134 Replies, 101,061 Views
Lawyer Salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
14,347 Replies, 4,827,166 Views
GovTech ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
487 Replies, 345,430 Views
DBS tech seed programme ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,093 Replies, 269,923 Views
How much to ask for starting pay... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
201 Replies, 68,578 Views
SIM-UOL fresh grad starting pay ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
6,152 Replies, 1,719,627 Views
GovTech Tech Associate Program... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
115 Replies, 44,693 Views
Anyone working in Recruit express? ( 1 2 3)
29 Replies, 39,077 Views
Compilation of MAs/Analysts Gross... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
823 Replies, 221,934 Views
Anyone work in JPM/GS/Morgan... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
64 Replies, 10,387 Views
High Finance Thread ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
347 Replies, 111,346 Views
NCS (SingTel subsidiary) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
575 Replies, 458,255 Views
Top paying companies in SG for... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
97 Replies, 138,512 Views
Hospital (Private or Public)... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
91 Replies, 27,037 Views
MINDEF DXO (All FAQ on it) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
4,204 Replies, 2,594,208 Views
Mnc jobs - a must in life ?? ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
168 Replies, 68,683 Views
Officer Role in Bank of Tokyo -... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
208 Replies, 172,206 Views
Working 2 FT (remote) jobs?...
2 Replies, 160 Views
Luxoft
0 Replies, 43 Views
DBS Graduate Associate Program ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
2,065 Replies, 567,113 Views
Grab Finance Graduate Programme... ( 1 2)
16 Replies, 2,037 Views
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 06:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2