GovTech

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Ratio is not the issue. The issue is that a significant number of GDS ACE ROs do not come from technical backgrounds, so how can they properly assess the performance of the engineers under them?

Maybe no need technical background? So long the engineer can demonstrate that he or she is capable of producing or maintaining good app , then up to the RO to write strong justification

Originally Posted by Unregistered

last year was 1 also right? cant really remember .

Last year 1.04

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Last year 1.04

are the changes good or bad? wonder whats their quota for each grade

Originally Posted by Unregistered

are the changes good or bad? wonder whats their quota for each grade

tiagong is bad

Originally Posted by Unregistered

are the changes good or bad? wonder whats their quota for each grade

Bad if your salary is at the higher end of the salary range for your salary grade.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Bad if your salary is at the higher end of the salary range for your salary grade.

Care to explain why it would be bad in this case? I'm near my current band already

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Bad if your salary is at the higher end of the salary range for your salary grade.

Why u say so tho

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Care to explain why it would be bad in this case? I'm near my current band already

Can share what's your band?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Care to explain why it would be bad in this case? I'm near my current band already

what is your current band range?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Bonus will be paid accordingly to job grade and performance grade only. So no respect for the job role ah?

what is the rational for this approach?