IMDA (under MCI)

Join Apple, Google, Meta to learn from the best

Join IMDA to learn from the worst

The quality of talent in that toilet bowl is really bad. Lack of tech knowledge, poor communication skills, think at a slow pace...an agency where the worst of the worst public officers are at...

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Join Apple, Google, Meta to learn from the best

Join IMDA to learn from the worst

The quality of talent in that toilet bowl is really bad. Lack of tech knowledge, poor communication skills, think at a slow pace...an agency where the worst of the worst public officers are at...

that cui for IMDA????

Originally Posted by Unregistered

that cui for IMDA????

I agree with OP. I was in another stat board before joining IMDA and left to join yet another stat board. I noticed the gulf between IMDA and the other 2 stat boards. People in IMDA are simply not as well read and eloquent as their peers from other parts of the gov. But like what was discussed in this thread, there isn't a need to hire top quality talents as the roles there are administrative in nature.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I agree with OP. I was in another stat board before joining IMDA and left to join yet another stat board. I noticed the gulf between IMDA and the other 2 stat boards. People in IMDA are simply not as well read and eloquent as their peers from other parts of the gov. But like what was discussed in this thread, there isn't a need to hire top quality talents as the roles there are administrative in nature.

Depends on which side of the house you joined. Regulatory or Industry Development. Regulatory work is in general more technical in nature while ID is not. Employee satisfaction is in general much higher in Reg than in ID.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I agree with OP. I was in another stat board before joining IMDA and left to join yet another stat board. I noticed the gulf between IMDA and the other 2 stat boards. People in IMDA are simply not as well read and eloquent as their peers from other parts of the gov. But like what was discussed in this thread, there isn't a need to hire top quality talents as the roles there are administrative in nature.

But IMDA ppl got good ppt skills. The slide deck design is on par with consulting firms.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

I agree with OP. I was in another stat board before joining IMDA and left to join yet another stat board. I noticed the gulf between IMDA and the other 2 stat boards. People in IMDA are simply not as well read and eloquent as their peers from other parts of the gov. But like what was discussed in this thread, there isn't a need to hire top quality talents as the roles there are administrative in nature.

Tell me which min or stat board is not administrative in nature? All in garment are paper pushers with minimal technical knowledge.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Tell me which min or stat board is not administrative in nature? All in garment are paper pushers with minimal technical knowledge.

Got la you noob. Those in MTI and MAS lor.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Tell me which min or stat board is not administrative in nature? All in garment are paper pushers with minimal technical knowledge.

Govtech which is in the same building as IMDA has 10x more tech people.

You must be one of those losers who are still stuck in IMDA that's why got no analytical skills.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Govtech which is in the same building as IMDA has 10x more tech people.

You must be one of those losers who are still stuck in IMDA that's why got no analytical skills.

You mean the losers who can't get jobs in the tech sector so have to work for government?

CE runs the organisation like North Korea

Directors who function as toxic bosses

HR has no idea how and where to hire real tech talents