Lawyer Salary

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Nothing complicated. Very straightforward story.

Associate involved in a trial. A document was filed on e-liti but not served. It was assoc's responsibility to ensure. Opponent obviously objected and/or claimed that it was not received. Document not admitted.

SC told the associate he/she need not return to the office.

Happened in a big 4 firm.

inb4 ToXiC wOrKpLaCe

Originally Posted by Unregistered

For 3.5k NQ per month I will send the docs correctly! Plz give me job thx

Even if gratuitous, a qualified lawyer has to send the documents correctly.
Bound by professional rules not a salary.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Even if gratuitous, a qualified lawyer has to send the documents correctly.
Bound by professional rules not a salary.

Yah lol, this one is negligence enough to breach PCR liao. Firing might even have been to appease the client and get him to not report to law soc

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Nothing complicated. Very straightforward story.

Associate involved in a trial. A document was filed on e-liti but not served. It was assoc's responsibility to ensure. Opponent obviously objected and/or claimed that it was not received. Document not admitted.

SC told the associate he/she need not return to the office.

Happened in a big 4 firm.

Is this an urban legend? Do u even liti? When u file a doc on elit it is served immediately on ur opponent. How can u file but not serve. Utter ******** on this forum

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Is this an urban legend? Do u even liti? When u file a doc on elit it is served immediately on ur opponent. How can u file but not serve. Utter ******** on this forum

Salty millenials spreading tales of fantastic beasts

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Do u even liti? When u file a doc on elit it is served immediately on ur opponent. How can u file but not serve. Utter ******** on this forum

just an observation: this is not correct. filing a document on eLitigation doesn't necessarily mean it will be served, much less immediately. The party filing the document has the option of serving, but will be charged $2 for each party it is served on.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Is this an urban legend? Do u even liti? When u file a doc on elit it is served immediately on ur opponent. How can u file but not serve. Utter ******** on this forum

Methinks you are the one who doesn't liti. Bet you don't even know there's a "service upon acceptance of filing" option on e-liti. Lol.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

just an observation: this is not correct. filing a document on eLitigation doesn't necessarily mean it will be served, much less immediately. The party filing the document has the option of serving, but will be charged $2 for each party it is served on.

Regardless. Its just fake news. I can't believe any sc sacking a poor junior for such small thing. Everyday such stuff happens at my firm and all still alive like heros

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Regardless. Its just fake news. I can't believe any sc sacking a poor junior for such small thing. Everyday such stuff happens at my firm and all still alive like heros

That's cause ur firm can only dream of having a SC LOL

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Is this an urban legend? Do u even liti? When u file a doc on elit it is served immediately on ur opponent. How can u file but not serve. Utter ******** on this forum

ya sia, the ******** spread by you.