Lawyer Salary

Originally Posted by Unregistered

RHT offering tc in their litigation department. anyone know who is the supervising solicitor and how is the culture like?

RHT gives off strong SME vibes.

Also, read the glassdoor reviews on the firm. Pretty interesting.

r&t banking tc good? Hours, training and people …

Originally Posted by Unregistered

RHT gives off strong SME vibes.

Also, read the glassdoor reviews on the firm. Pretty interesting.

because I look at their page profile. quite a lot of notable people so thought it would be a good firm. U nvr know, I guess hahaha

Originally Posted by Unregistered

because I look at their page profile. quite a lot of notable people so thought it would be a good firm. U nvr know, I guess hahaha

General rule of thumb when assessing a law firm's quality is to look at the bench strength of their 'mainline' (rank-and-file) partners. These are the partners that are actually doing the work / cultivating the client relationships actively on a day to day basis.

Are the mainline partners notable? Are they known for high value or high profile deals and cases that are commonly featured in legal industry publication? Do they have notable clients? Do they have steady stream of clients? Or are they unknowns? (posting on linkedin incessantly all day doesn't count).

Not the Consultants or Senior Partners or Senior Consultants or Consultant Emeritus etc etc. Firms sometimes pad their roster with these distinguished names from the legal industry to lend an aura of respectability and gravitas. But in reality, the presence of these names may not really translate to much in terms of client relationships and actual work.

Between CC and Baker disputes, which should i choose?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Between CC and Baker disputes, which should i choose?

CC has been bleeding away its good disputes partners for some time, baker has never had a strong disputes practice in the first place, so both are not great options.

However, CC pays more.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

CC has been bleeding away its good disputes partners for some time, baker has never had a strong disputes practice in the first place, so both are not great options.

However, CC pays more.

I understand Baker has more niche strengths, such as in constructions, employment and Insolvency. CC disputes seems to be more general, do everything that comes in-type arrangement. A few amount of work comes through the other practice groups.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

r&t banking tc good? Hours, training and people …

If you are good you would not even consider them.

What is the DRD salary range for Assoc 0-4 PQE?

Are they still fully Hybrid

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Maybe its because this forum is for "salary" questions and not dumb retarded questions like "can my TC stay the old regime under 6 months because i want be a lawyer faster"

I agree with the guy who said OP should not complain.

Ask stupid question, get stupid answer from us

so whats your salary?