Lawyer Salary - Page 1004 - Salary.sg Forums
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Lawyer Salary

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #10031 (permalink)  
Old 19-01-2021, 07:40 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi Seniors, could i ask whether a CAP of 4.0 in NUS qualify you for the top 50%? If fact, what percentile would a student with such a CAP be?

I ask this because there are certain requirements that i have to meet. Thanks in advance!

Reply With Quote
  #10032 (permalink)  
Old 20-01-2021, 01:58 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Hi Seniors, could i ask whether a CAP of 4.0 in NUS qualify you for the top 50%? If fact, what percentile would a student with such a CAP be?

I ask this because there are certain requirements that i have to meet. Thanks in advance!
4.0 is way above the threshold for top 50%. Don't worry. You would probably be around the 75th percentile

Reply With Quote
  #10033 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 09:50 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Any reviews on KCL LLM in international financial law?

Reply With Quote
  #10034 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 10:25 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Any reviews on KCL LLM in international financial law?
Did an LLM with Kings, but not in international financial law. I figure some of the modules overlap though.

The content of the mods weren't difficult. As long as you've been a law student before, the content is actually quite easy, certainly easier than undergrad imo.

My issue was actually class participation (graded), practice essays (ungraded) and the tutorials (over adobe's version of zoom) (ungraded). It's A LOT of time and effort from my day. I would not do it over.

I also did not enjoy my interactions with the profs. Some were stellar and some were just cmi. It was luck of the draw.

School fees were payable on module which was great cause then i could pay it off with my salary and i didnt need to take on any additional financial obligations.

I completed the course in just under 2 years.
Reply With Quote
  #10035 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 03:22 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I've been asked to write something about the Lee Suet Fern case, so I've done a quick summary of the judgment, and added my brief views on the matter. This is a politically explosive matter concerning high profile people in my industry, so don't expect any spicy takes from me! (Not publicly on Facebook at least.)

LACK OF DILIGENCE
At [149](a)-(b): LSF had made material representations to LKY in the execution process that she had no basis to make, which is, at best, irresponsible. Namely, she told him that the version of the Will he was signing was identical to the one he executed several versions ago (ie this was simply a reversion to a Will he had executed previously). In reliance of this, LKY then went ahead to sign the Will. As it turns out, there actually existed several material differences from the version he previously signed. Crucially, LSF had not seen the executed previous version, so she was in no position to assure him that it was the same. As such, she failed to ascertain that the Will truly reflected the testator's (LKY's) intentions, which is a cardinal sin for Will drafting.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
[149](c)-(d), (h): By playing such a central role in the execution of LKY's last Will while being the wife of a major beneficiary as set out above, LSF was in a position of conflict of interest as a lawyer. As such, she should have advised LKY to seek independent legal advice. She did not. Had she been in a solicitor-client relationship, this would have been a grave breach. Nonetheless, she had divided loyalties, being married to LHY, a beneficiary, and also servicing LKY as she would a client.

OTHER QUESTIONABLE ACTIONS
[149](e)-(g): LSF allowed LKY to execute the Will despite knowledge of the above, and left KKL out of most of the material correspondence. She then failed to fully inform her what happened even after the fact. She did not clarify with LKY who drafted the last Will, and if it was indeed identical to an earlier Will he had executed.

The court also found that she had been less than honest in trying to minimise her involvement to the court, although they also found that she did not act dishonestly in getting the Will executed.

WHY NOT STRUCK OFF?
LSF got off lightly, all things considered, because she was found not to be in a lawyer-client relationship with LKY. As such, her transgressions were only poor form for a lawyer, but did not breach the lawyer-client relationship, which is far more serious. All lawyers owe duties to their clients, and failure to advance one's client's best interests, acting in conflict of interest are serious breaches of a lawyer's duties.

Whether there exists a lawyer-client relationship will depend on the facts. Even if no contract was signed, if BOTH parties understood there to be one and acted in that manner, such a relationship can arise (judgment at [61]).

In this case, the court found that a lawyer-client relationship did not exist (judgment at [133]) because while LSF viewed herself as acting as LKY's lawyer (judgment at [127]), LKY did not view LSF as being his lawyer (judgment at [130]), as he thought Kwa had a hand in drafting the final Will.

MY VIEWS
This is a very ugly and public spat. I hope it's over.

As a lawyer, it should have been clear to LSF that the situation was one where she was in a position of conflict. As such, she ought to have gone out of her way to ensure that there wasn't even the slightest appearance of impropriety. She could have safeguarded herself by waiting for KKL to get get back, and/or at least keeping KKL copied in ALL correspondence. Whether inadvertently (LHY was the first to omit KKL from the chain, if she hit "reply all" thereafter, she may not have realised KKL was no longer looped in) or otherwise, she did not.

While the speed with which the Will was signed may well have been on LKY's instructions, again, given how sensitive this all was, every effort should have been made to keep KKL or her staff in the loop to avoid future allegations of impropriety.

Personally, though, I think the final Will, with the demolition clause reinstated, is more consistent with the public stance LKY has had regarding his house all these years.

I am grateful that 38 Oxley will not be demolished, because I feel it is a part of our national heritage. But LKY of all people should have known that the demolition clause cannot override the State: he pushed through reforms in land law that gave the State ultimate power over property here. Many property owners have been displaced over the years, sometimes with inadequate compensation, to make way for development. But would we have had such progress if proprietary rights were recognised? The URA would've spent years litigating against stubborn landowners, or a fortune to buy them out. If PM Lee or the government of the day were so minded, an act of Parliament could have been passed to preserve 38 Oxley, notwithstanding what the Will said.

Still, I think this whole matter is actually a proxy fight, and the underlying issues remain unaddressed. This kind of family thing often no right no wrong one, and those of us who are not privy to what's going on can only speculate.

But hopefully this brings the whole unhappy episode to a close. I think the public is getting quite tired of seeing the Lee family dirty laundry being aired in public, and expensive legal cases being brought to settle private family affairs.


SL of LVM

Are you the joker who just joined my firm?
Reply With Quote
  #10036 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 03:24 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Did an LLM with Kings, but not in international financial law. I figure some of the modules overlap though.

The content of the mods weren't difficult. As long as you've been a law student before, the content is actually quite easy, certainly easier than undergrad imo.

My issue was actually class participation (graded), practice essays (ungraded) and the tutorials (over adobe's version of zoom) (ungraded). It's A LOT of time and effort from my day. I would not do it over.

I also did not enjoy my interactions with the profs. Some were stellar and some were just cmi. It was luck of the draw.

School fees were payable on module which was great cause then i could pay it off with my salary and i didnt need to take on any additional financial obligations.

I completed the course in just under 2 years.
What’s the benefit of the LLM? Or did you just have too much money and time?
Reply With Quote

  #10037 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 09:48 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Are you the joker who just joined my firm?
SL of LVM la
Reply With Quote
  #10038 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 09:54 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
agree. England is a much larger economic entity, and English law is the preferred governing law for many agreements (just as with English jurisdiction). Even the top Australian firms all kena merged with English firms.

this reminds me of how meaningless the NUS v KCL debate here is.
Just debating with myself about moving to New York v London - USA domestic law is of course incredibly lucrative (more than any other type of law in the world), but 1) unlike English law which is transferrable in M&A, Construction, Projects, etc. it's only really transferrable for Capital Markets and some types of banking and 2) NY hours are just brutal.
Reply With Quote
  #10039 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2021, 10:12 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
What’s the benefit of the LLM? Or did you just have too much money and time?
It was useful in getting me in-house offers.
Absolutely useless in practice.
Reply With Quote
  #10040 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2021, 12:01 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
It was useful in getting me in-house offers.
Absolutely useless in practice.
You mean before LLM you were unsuccessful in landing inhouse roles because you didn’t hold post graduate education?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
advocate, law, lawyer, legal, solicitor

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
From Lawyer Insider: Life is Glamorous but Unsatisfying Salary.sg Income and Jobs 31 15-01-2018 12:40 PM

» 30 Recent Threads
Compare civil service salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
11,419 Replies, 6,401,252 Views
Work culture in IHiS ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
95 Replies, 95,791 Views
SIM-UOL fresh grad starting pay ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
4,527 Replies, 1,449,895 Views
ST Electronics ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,538 Replies, 359,517 Views
lazada/shopee fresh grad starting... ( 1 2 3)
21 Replies, 1,891 Views
Career as Teacher ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,114 Replies, 1,968,172 Views
Civil Svc/ Statboard - Typical... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
2,896 Replies, 1,298,649 Views
Electricity generator
4 Replies, 543 Views
How is life as a doctor in... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,773 Replies, 1,102,529 Views
DBS Graduate Associate Program ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
797 Replies, 413,114 Views
Factual Local Bank Salaries - DBS... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
217 Replies, 133,353 Views
Capgemini tester trainee ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
32 Replies, 1,635 Views
Lawyer Salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
10,240 Replies, 3,504,472 Views
Compilation of MAs/Analysts Gross... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
189 Replies, 54,476 Views
How rich/poor am I compared to... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
57 Replies, 44,308 Views
Roles in accenture singapore ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
489 Replies, 304,466 Views
Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,189 Replies, 907,397 Views
Hospital (Private or Public)... ( 1 2)
16 Replies, 8,302 Views
Civil Service Performance Bonus ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,793 Replies, 1,484,838 Views
anyone working at NCS ? ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
487 Replies, 352,972 Views
26 no degree is all hope lost?... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
48 Replies, 2,061 Views
UBS Financial Services Industry... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
160 Replies, 37,438 Views
Ex-MOE Teachers ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
127 Replies, 137,943 Views
Head of Trading
4 Replies, 923 Views
What's the graduate officer... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
70 Replies, 24,868 Views
MAS : Mid Career Professionals ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
259 Replies, 168,636 Views
NUS working environment and pay... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
98 Replies, 85,047 Views
MFA- Foreign Service... ( 1 2 3)
28 Replies, 8,847 Views
Higher nitec in services -...
0 Replies, 54 Views
High Finance Thread ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
163 Replies, 42,358 Views
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2