Lawyer Salary - Page 1004 - Salary.sg Forums
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Lawyer Salary

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #10031 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 03:22 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I've been asked to write something about the Lee Suet Fern case, so I've done a quick summary of the judgment, and added my brief views on the matter. This is a politically explosive matter concerning high profile people in my industry, so don't expect any spicy takes from me! (Not publicly on Facebook at least.)

LACK OF DILIGENCE
At [149](a)-(b): LSF had made material representations to LKY in the execution process that she had no basis to make, which is, at best, irresponsible. Namely, she told him that the version of the Will he was signing was identical to the one he executed several versions ago (ie this was simply a reversion to a Will he had executed previously). In reliance of this, LKY then went ahead to sign the Will. As it turns out, there actually existed several material differences from the version he previously signed. Crucially, LSF had not seen the executed previous version, so she was in no position to assure him that it was the same. As such, she failed to ascertain that the Will truly reflected the testator's (LKY's) intentions, which is a cardinal sin for Will drafting.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST
[149](c)-(d), (h): By playing such a central role in the execution of LKY's last Will while being the wife of a major beneficiary as set out above, LSF was in a position of conflict of interest as a lawyer. As such, she should have advised LKY to seek independent legal advice. She did not. Had she been in a solicitor-client relationship, this would have been a grave breach. Nonetheless, she had divided loyalties, being married to LHY, a beneficiary, and also servicing LKY as she would a client.

OTHER QUESTIONABLE ACTIONS
[149](e)-(g): LSF allowed LKY to execute the Will despite knowledge of the above, and left KKL out of most of the material correspondence. She then failed to fully inform her what happened even after the fact. She did not clarify with LKY who drafted the last Will, and if it was indeed identical to an earlier Will he had executed.

The court also found that she had been less than honest in trying to minimise her involvement to the court, although they also found that she did not act dishonestly in getting the Will executed.

WHY NOT STRUCK OFF?
LSF got off lightly, all things considered, because she was found not to be in a lawyer-client relationship with LKY. As such, her transgressions were only poor form for a lawyer, but did not breach the lawyer-client relationship, which is far more serious. All lawyers owe duties to their clients, and failure to advance one's client's best interests, acting in conflict of interest are serious breaches of a lawyer's duties.

Whether there exists a lawyer-client relationship will depend on the facts. Even if no contract was signed, if BOTH parties understood there to be one and acted in that manner, such a relationship can arise (judgment at [61]).

In this case, the court found that a lawyer-client relationship did not exist (judgment at [133]) because while LSF viewed herself as acting as LKY's lawyer (judgment at [127]), LKY did not view LSF as being his lawyer (judgment at [130]), as he thought Kwa had a hand in drafting the final Will.

MY VIEWS
This is a very ugly and public spat. I hope it's over.

As a lawyer, it should have been clear to LSF that the situation was one where she was in a position of conflict. As such, she ought to have gone out of her way to ensure that there wasn't even the slightest appearance of impropriety. She could have safeguarded herself by waiting for KKL to get get back, and/or at least keeping KKL copied in ALL correspondence. Whether inadvertently (LHY was the first to omit KKL from the chain, if she hit "reply all" thereafter, she may not have realised KKL was no longer looped in) or otherwise, she did not.

While the speed with which the Will was signed may well have been on LKY's instructions, again, given how sensitive this all was, every effort should have been made to keep KKL or her staff in the loop to avoid future allegations of impropriety.

Personally, though, I think the final Will, with the demolition clause reinstated, is more consistent with the public stance LKY has had regarding his house all these years.

I am grateful that 38 Oxley will not be demolished, because I feel it is a part of our national heritage. But LKY of all people should have known that the demolition clause cannot override the State: he pushed through reforms in land law that gave the State ultimate power over property here. Many property owners have been displaced over the years, sometimes with inadequate compensation, to make way for development. But would we have had such progress if proprietary rights were recognised? The URA would've spent years litigating against stubborn landowners, or a fortune to buy them out. If PM Lee or the government of the day were so minded, an act of Parliament could have been passed to preserve 38 Oxley, notwithstanding what the Will said.

Still, I think this whole matter is actually a proxy fight, and the underlying issues remain unaddressed. This kind of family thing often no right no wrong one, and those of us who are not privy to what's going on can only speculate.

But hopefully this brings the whole unhappy episode to a close. I think the public is getting quite tired of seeing the Lee family dirty laundry being aired in public, and expensive legal cases being brought to settle private family affairs.


SL of LVM

Are you the joker who just joined my firm?

Reply With Quote
  #10032 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 03:24 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Did an LLM with Kings, but not in international financial law. I figure some of the modules overlap though.

The content of the mods weren't difficult. As long as you've been a law student before, the content is actually quite easy, certainly easier than undergrad imo.

My issue was actually class participation (graded), practice essays (ungraded) and the tutorials (over adobe's version of zoom) (ungraded). It's A LOT of time and effort from my day. I would not do it over.

I also did not enjoy my interactions with the profs. Some were stellar and some were just cmi. It was luck of the draw.

School fees were payable on module which was great cause then i could pay it off with my salary and i didnt need to take on any additional financial obligations.

I completed the course in just under 2 years.
Whatís the benefit of the LLM? Or did you just have too much money and time?

Reply With Quote
  #10033 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 09:48 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Are you the joker who just joined my firm?
SL of LVM la

Reply With Quote
  #10034 (permalink)  
Old 21-01-2021, 09:54 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
agree. England is a much larger economic entity, and English law is the preferred governing law for many agreements (just as with English jurisdiction). Even the top Australian firms all kena merged with English firms.

this reminds me of how meaningless the NUS v KCL debate here is.
Just debating with myself about moving to New York v London - USA domestic law is of course incredibly lucrative (more than any other type of law in the world), but 1) unlike English law which is transferrable in M&A, Construction, Projects, etc. it's only really transferrable for Capital Markets and some types of banking and 2) NY hours are just brutal.


Primary School English Grammar and Vocabulary Drills
Primary School English Grammar and Vocabulary Drills


SG Bus Timing App
SG Bus Timing App - the best bus app - available on iOS and Android


Bursa Stocks Android App - check share prices
Bursa Stocks [Android] App - check latest share prices on the go


SGX Stocks Android App - check share prices
SGX Stocks [Android] App - check latest share prices on the go


SGX Stocks for iPad - check latest Singapore share prices
SGX Stocks [iPad] app
| SGX Stocks [iPhone] app
Reply With Quote
  #10035 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2021, 10:12 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Whatís the benefit of the LLM? Or did you just have too much money and time?
It was useful in getting me in-house offers.
Absolutely useless in practice.
Reply With Quote
  #10036 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2021, 12:01 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
It was useful in getting me in-house offers.
Absolutely useless in practice.
You mean before LLM you were unsuccessful in landing inhouse roles because you didnít hold post graduate education?
Reply With Quote

  #10037 (permalink)  
Old 22-01-2021, 12:39 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
You mean before LLM you were unsuccessful in landing inhouse roles because you didnít hold post graduate education?
No. I was already in-house with a F500 in a regional role.

The problem is moving up. I started out my in-house career with a German company, and everyone in the legal and compliance department (at HQ) had at least a masters. Many of them had PhDs.

I thereafter left the German company and was offered a position with a US company which stated in their jd that post-grad degree was preferable. I did not take up this offer.

Instead, I joined a European JV and in the welcome email sent to global legal colleagues introducing me, head office wrote: xx graduated from King's College, London with an LLM in xxxx".
Reply With Quote
  #10038 (permalink)  
Old 23-01-2021, 12:49 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kings grads flooding these forums lmao. So sad.

The reality is Melbourne/Sydney/UNSW are all above Kings. Both in terms of cohort and curriculum.
Reply With Quote
  #10039 (permalink)  
Old 23-01-2021, 01:07 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Kings grads flooding these forums lmao. So sad.

The reality is Melbourne/Sydney/UNSW are all above Kings. Both in terms of cohort and curriculum.
Lol, slip a shrimp on the barbie and dream on then mate
Reply With Quote
  #10040 (permalink)  
Old 23-01-2021, 08:17 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Lol, slip a shrimp on the barbie and dream on then mate
KCL LLB grad detected

Your alma mater is a degree mill


Primary School English Grammar and Vocabulary Drills
Primary School English Grammar and Vocabulary Drills


SG Bus Timing App
SG Bus Timing App - the best bus app - available on iOS and Android


Bursa Stocks Android App - check share prices
Bursa Stocks [Android] App - check latest share prices on the go


SGX Stocks Android App - check share prices
SGX Stocks [Android] App - check latest share prices on the go


SGX Stocks for iPad - check latest Singapore share prices
SGX Stocks [iPad] app
| SGX Stocks [iPhone] app
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
advocate, law, lawyer, legal, solicitor

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
From Lawyer Insider: Life is Glamorous but Unsatisfying Salary.sg Income and Jobs 31 15-01-2018 12:40 PM

» 30 Recent Threads
Rakuten Software Engineer (Fresh...
6 Replies, 1,152 Views
Roles in accenture singapore ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
5,945 Replies, 1,579,918 Views
Career as Teacher ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
7,722 Replies, 4,803,284 Views
ST Electronics ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,291 Replies, 1,123,645 Views
HTX (Home Team Science and... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
171 Replies, 86,286 Views
How is life as a doctor in... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
4,801 Replies, 2,498,921 Views
GovTech ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,604 Replies, 1,300,468 Views
How much are you earning per annum? ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
13,737 Replies, 5,846,729 Views
Credit Suisse salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
50 Replies, 26,619 Views
Lawyer Salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
19,056 Replies, 8,358,871 Views
Singapore Airlines
5 Replies, 1,124 Views
MOH Holdings ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
44 Replies, 17,939 Views
Civil Service Performance Bonus ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
4,656 Replies, 3,780,194 Views
Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
10,072 Replies, 3,591,990 Views
SIM-UOL fresh grad starting pay ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
6,799 Replies, 2,505,410 Views
DSTA (under Mindef) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,314 Replies, 1,070,176 Views
DBS tech seed programme ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
3,009 Replies, 1,039,365 Views
IBM salaries ( 1 2)
14 Replies, 1,389 Views
LTA (Land Transport Authority) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
310 Replies, 204,062 Views
merit increment in civil service ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
105 Replies, 157,151 Views
Civil Svc/ Statboard - Typical... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
5,278 Replies, 2,963,039 Views
Management Consultant in Singapore ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
42 Replies, 91,970 Views
DBS Graduate Associate Program ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
2,235 Replies, 841,050 Views
Compare civil service salary ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
15,276 Replies, 10,663,297 Views
MAS for Mid Career Professionals ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,381 Replies, 718,002 Views
HSBC Bank ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
43 Replies, 73,666 Views
Dso & htx
8 Replies, 1,394 Views
Tech business
4 Replies, 940 Views
NCS (SingTel subsidiary) ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1,156 Replies, 845,528 Views
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.2



All times are GMT +8. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2023, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2