 |
|
10-12-2021, 12:10 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
NO.. When I transfer to GT, I got H and I’m MX11a..
|
usually the mapping as followed
D,E,F = MX13/12 - M
G,H = MX11/11a - SM/AD
I = MX10 lower - AD/SAD
J = MX10 upper - SAD/DD
K = MX9 - D
|
10-12-2021, 12:12 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
So did you tell them this? What was their response?
|
HR said the grade mapping is correct?
FYI, in GT 60% is G/H/i which is on par with all other agencies in MX11/11a
|
10-12-2021, 12:15 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
usually the mapping as followed
D,E,F = MX13/12 - M
G,H = MX11/11a - SM/AD
I = MX10 lower - AD/SAD
J = MX10 upper - SAD/DD
K = MX9 - D
|
where else use the MX scheme...
was from statbooard it dont use MX de,
Executive , consultant , senior con, lead con, SDD DD D
|
10-12-2021, 12:39 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
usually the mapping as followed
D,E,F = MX13/12 - AM/M
G,H = MX11 - SM/AD
I = MX11A - AD/SAD
J = MX10 - SAD/DD
K = MX9 - D
|
^ Perhaps this would be more accurate. Do check with HR...
|
10-12-2021, 01:00 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
where else use the MX scheme...
was from statbooard it dont use MX de,
Executive , consultant , senior con, lead con, SDD DD D
|
lead con = mx 11
|
10-12-2021, 01:06 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
^ Perhaps this would be more accurate. Do check with HR...
|
k is mx 9 superscale equiv dd
|
10-12-2021, 01:10 AM
|
|
|
D,e, mx13 am
f,g mx12 m
h mx11 sm
i mx11a ad
j mx10 sad
k mx9 dd
l mx8 d
|
10-12-2021, 01:24 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
where else use the MX scheme...
was from statbooard it dont use MX de,
Executive , consultant , senior con, lead con, SDD DD D
|
All statboard mapping still follow MX…just different title
|
10-12-2021, 01:26 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
^ Perhaps this would be more accurate. Do check with HR...
|
Nah, if pay wise is MX10 equivalent why bother…
|
10-12-2021, 01:32 AM
|
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Nah, if pay wise is MX10 equivalent why bother…
|
talking about appt wise la not pay wis
tech pay is higher than mx
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
