GovTech

Originally Posted by Unregistered

NO.. When I transfer to GT, I got H and I’m MX11a..

usually the mapping as followed

D,E,F = MX13/12 - M
G,H = MX11/11a - SM/AD
I = MX10 lower - AD/SAD
J = MX10 upper - SAD/DD
K = MX9 - D

Originally Posted by Unregistered

So did you tell them this? What was their response?

HR said the grade mapping is correct?

FYI, in GT 60% is G/H/i which is on par with all other agencies in MX11/11a

Originally Posted by Unregistered

usually the mapping as followed

D,E,F = MX13/12 - M
G,H = MX11/11a - SM/AD
I = MX10 lower - AD/SAD
J = MX10 upper - SAD/DD
K = MX9 - D

where else use the MX scheme...

was from statbooard it dont use MX de,

Executive , consultant , senior con, lead con, SDD DD D

Originally Posted by Unregistered

usually the mapping as followed

D,E,F = MX13/12 - AM/M
G,H = MX11 - SM/AD
I = MX11A - AD/SAD
J = MX10 - SAD/DD
K = MX9 - D

^ Perhaps this would be more accurate. Do check with HR...

Originally Posted by Unregistered

where else use the MX scheme...

was from statbooard it dont use MX de,

Executive , consultant , senior con, lead con, SDD DD D

lead con = mx 11

Originally Posted by Unregistered

^ Perhaps this would be more accurate. Do check with HR...

k is mx 9 superscale equiv dd

D,e, mx13 am
f,g mx12 m
h mx11 sm

i mx11a ad
j mx10 sad

k mx9 dd
l mx8 d

Originally Posted by Unregistered

where else use the MX scheme...

was from statbooard it dont use MX de,

Executive , consultant , senior con, lead con, SDD DD D

All statboard mapping still follow MX…just different title

Originally Posted by Unregistered

^ Perhaps this would be more accurate. Do check with HR...

Nah, if pay wise is MX10 equivalent why bother…

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Nah, if pay wise is MX10 equivalent why bother…

talking about appt wise la not pay wis
tech pay is higher than mx