|
|
12-05-2022, 06:35 PM
|
|
For those who moved in-house, any regrets?
|
12-05-2022, 08:44 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
For those who moved in-house, any regrets?
|
Nope. Didn't feel like a lawyer at first doing deep-dive legal work, but you adapt to it pretty quickly.
Then you realize that there's a whole world outside the ivory tower of legal practice where you understand how companies actually work.
I hear my ex colleagues still in practice burning day and night, while I almost always knock off on the dot barring a few exceptional days. The pay is decent considering the hours worked. I don't think I can go back to practice.
One caveat though - I was from a mid tier firm so it represents an overall better outcome. YMMV. If you're in a top tier law firm, it might not make financial sense to move inhouse especially to take a paycut.
|
13-05-2022, 09:28 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Nope. Didn't feel like a lawyer at first doing deep-dive legal work, but you adapt to it pretty quickly.
Then you realize that there's a whole world outside the ivory tower of legal practice where you understand how companies actually work.
I hear my ex colleagues still in practice burning day and night, while I almost always knock off on the dot barring a few exceptional days. The pay is decent considering the hours worked. I don't think I can go back to practice.
One caveat though - I was from a mid tier firm so it represents an overall better outcome. YMMV. If you're in a top tier law firm, it might not make financial sense to move inhouse especially to take a paycut.
|
I came from a magic circle firm and went in-house, not for the better hours, but to "understand how companies actually work" as the person who posted above mentions. It's eye-opening. I did not take a paycut, and am still slightly above MC peers, and just about at white-shoe pay (but not Cravath with full bonus). Hours are not significantly better, but a lot more control of my time.
So going in-house doesn't always mean you earn less for the near-term (3 to 5 years). For the long-term, probably less, since partnership in those firms pays better.
|
13-05-2022, 02:04 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
How is our learned friend as opposing counsel? Any experiences?
|
Charles keep posting IG about Suet Fern , Shengwu
Bullcrap of a politician really , not smart at all, you want both MIW & Oppo to be dominated by the LKY descendants? Ownself oppose ownself
|
13-05-2022, 04:40 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Charles keep posting IG about Suet Fern , Shengwu
Bullcrap of a politician really , not smart at all, you want both MIW & Oppo to be dominated by the LKY descendants? Ownself oppose ownself
|
Political hedging is a risk management strategy employed to offset losses in votes by taking an opposite position against the incumbent to ensure your clan's political survival.
The reduction in risk provided by political hedging also typically results in a reduction in potential votes for the incumbent, and requires cultivation of past enemies of your political family as your proxies.
The best way to understand political hedging is to think of it as a form of insurance for the survival of your clan in politics. When a political family and their politically related relatives decide to hedge, they are insuring themselves against a negative outcome's impact on their family's political prominence.
|
13-05-2022, 05:32 PM
|
|
Quite a number of old partners have been exiting the industry lately. Is there a shortage of lawyers plaguing the profession?
|
13-05-2022, 06:33 PM
|
|
this reads like a journalist's prompt to test industry sentiments, in preparation for a potential article
|
13-05-2022, 08:35 PM
|
|
How much do fam lawyers make? Estimate the amount for 1PQE - 4PQE
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|