|
|
09-10-2020, 02:01 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
does sub judice apply to civil proceedings?
|
Yawn. Spare me.......
|
09-10-2020, 02:03 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
does sub judice apply to civil proceedings?
|
Crap la... dont be rich. Arbo ask
Does poha apply to this forum
Does pofma apply to this forum
Does defamation apply to this forum
Does penal code apply to this forum
Did these stop anonymous cowards from spouting toxic rubbish on this forum
|
09-10-2020, 06:31 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
What a load of bull from a chao gei kiang. U dont want to go into merits cos for courts to decide. Then u go into politics and motivations cos u r cabinet? Ur client ask u for merits advice u say u cant go into merits cos u not the court?
|
Lol one guy that obviously is not a lawyer and/or doesn't know what he's talking about.
Eh brother, you his client meh? Don't act gei kiang here when you behaving like an idiot leh. People don't want to talk about the Court's possible decision is out of respect for the Court process. What stupid linkage you think you doing? This is a client-attorney discussion meh, you got pay him to discuss his legal opinion of the case? He don't want to discuss the merits in an open forum doesn't mean he won't discuss with his client, don't put out ridiculous strawman arguments.
Anyway, I think you got a comprehension problem. The initial question ask what you think of LT's defence so he was answering the question right? People ask you A, you respond about B one isit?
So my question to you is simple, you got a problem with comprehension or a problem with Court etiquette?
|
09-10-2020, 06:45 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Lol one guy that obviously is not a lawyer and/or doesn't know what he's talking about.
Eh brother, you his client meh? Don't act gei kiang here when you behaving like an idiot leh. People don't want to talk about the Court's possible decision is out of respect for the Court process. What stupid linkage you think you doing? This is a client-attorney discussion meh, you got pay him to discuss his legal opinion of the case? He don't want to discuss the merits in an open forum doesn't mean he won't discuss with his client, don't put out ridiculous strawman arguments.
Anyway, I think you got a comprehension problem. The initial question ask what you think of LT's defence so he was answering the question right? People ask you A, you respond about B one isit?
So my question to you is simple, you got a problem with comprehension or a problem with Court etiquette?
|
U are him isit cb
|
09-10-2020, 06:49 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Lol one guy that obviously is not a lawyer and/or doesn't know what he's talking about.
Eh brother, you his client meh? Don't act gei kiang here when you behaving like an idiot leh. People don't want to talk about the Court's possible decision is out of respect for the Court process. What stupid linkage you think you doing? This is a client-attorney discussion meh, you got pay him to discuss his legal opinion of the case? He don't want to discuss the merits in an open forum doesn't mean he won't discuss with his client, don't put out ridiculous strawman arguments.
Anyway, I think you got a comprehension problem. The initial question ask what you think of LT's defence so he was answering the question right? People ask you A, you respond about B one isit?
So my question to you is simple, you got a problem with comprehension or a problem with Court etiquette?
|
I got a problem with u. Which firm u from sister.
|
09-10-2020, 07:15 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Lol one guy that obviously is not a lawyer and/or doesn't know what he's talking about.
Eh brother, you his client meh? Don't act gei kiang here when you behaving like an idiot leh. People don't want to talk about the Court's possible decision is out of respect for the Court process. What stupid linkage you think you doing? This is a client-attorney discussion meh, you got pay him to discuss his legal opinion of the case? He don't want to discuss the merits in an open forum doesn't mean he won't discuss with his client, don't put out ridiculous strawman arguments.
Anyway, I think you got a comprehension problem. The initial question ask what you think of LT's defence so he was answering the question right? People ask you A, you respond about B one isit?
So my question to you is simple, you got a problem with comprehension or a problem with Court etiquette?
|
Lol u must be from kcl
|
09-10-2020, 07:31 PM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I got a problem with u. Which firm u from sister.
|
ah tan side one. toh teng jit ki ang ji kao, u wu ji come sccdr la
|
10-10-2020, 10:16 AM
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I have heard that law firms are starting to cut staff from bottom up because work is slowing down in general and this is also to provide better job security for partners. How true is this statement?
|
this statement is true to a certain extent
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
» 30 Recent Threads |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|