GovTech

Originally Posted by Unregistered

any perm staff got terminated? any contract staff got convert to perm?
ARs are 100% byebye,no extension

In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?

u shuld write to PM if its real.
i've never heard of AR staying, most ARs are let go once their contract expires.
HR had placed AR under MMF even though officially AR is not under MMF. thats why AR to go first, that'll reduce Headcoubt. surprised by wat your division did.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?

Ur div doesn’t seem to work on anything critical. A boss who knows his stuff and staff wouldn’t allow such thing to happen unless the goal is to sunset the div. When a critical mass of critical staff are gone, the rest will just leave at an accelerated speed as they can’t take the load anymore. I suggest you find another place asap before it’s too late.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Ur div doesn’t seem to work on anything critical. A boss who knows his stuff and staff wouldn’t allow such thing to happen unless the goal is to sunset the div. When a critical mass of critical staff are gone, the rest will just leave at an accelerated speed as they can’t take the load anymore. I suggest you find another place asap before it’s too late.

Don’t jump to conclusion too quickly. In my place, ARs got backfilled but perms are not. It’s gonna be BAU.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Don’t jump to conclusion too quickly. In my place, ARs got backfilled but perms are not. It’s gonna be BAU.

Er, isn’t there budget cut?

Originally Posted by Unregistered

In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?

if ARs so weak, why can’t perms just starve/sabo them…no more support, guidance n make sure u never give away ur secret weapon. lalala.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

any perm staff got terminated? any contract staff got convert to perm?
ARs are 100% byebye,no extension

Perm will not get terminated. Unless u have been in pip then u got that coming already.

Conversion? Highly unlikely cause who dare to bring up. Just extend another year also no problem. Benefits all remain the same

Originally Posted by Unregistered

In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?

If write suggest to write to WP or board member. Cause the root cause hasn't been addressed properly which is ex indeed

Originally Posted by Unregistered

In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?

If write suggest to write to WP or board member. Cause the root cause hasn't been addressed properly which is ex indeed..

[QUOTE=Unregistered;272314]In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?



If write suggest to write to WP or board member. Cause the root cause hasn't been addressed properly which is ex indeed