DBS tech seed programme

Originally Posted by Unregistered

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH OMG, this is just straight up copium

Firstky, not just people in the banking/tech industry, everyone and their mother will move if you can offer them higher rank and pay. So thats kinda like a no **** sherlock. Secondly, You must be super fking high if you think DBS is on the same level as FAANG, Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan.

Brooo you think damn immaturely, like a frog in the well.
Use your brain and think, people would rather be MD or CEO of even BreadTalk, than go FAANG, Goldman or JP Morgan and be operations or analyst etc

Please la help yourself hehe, use your brain and think. The context matters. Ask any veterans, they will tell you that the brand of the company doesn’t matter if you doing jackshit there

Originally Posted by Unregistered

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAH OMG, this is just straight up copium

Firstky, not just people in the banking/tech industry, everyone and their mother will move if you can offer them higher rank and pay. So thats kinda like a no **** sherlock. Secondly, You must be super fking high if you think DBS is on the same level as FAANG, Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan.

Lmfaoooooo this guy legit damn dumb fk. He is like a small frog in a well GAHAHAH.
I have a friend who’s in Goldman Sach operations and technology, his entry pay is 5k. He say no much progression available, and his increment 2-3% per year. Worst off is need to OT af. So lmfaooooo those big brands don’t mean **** if your opportunities in them is ****. Worst off is you cannot jump to other places cos you stuck in that function LOL

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Brooo you think damn immaturely, like a frog in the well.
Use your brain and think, people would rather be MD or CEO of even BreadTalk, than go FAANG, Goldman or JP Morgan and be operations or analyst etc

Please la help yourself hehe, use your brain and think. The context matters. Ask any veterans, they will tell you that the brand of the company doesn’t matter if you doing jackshit there

No wonder you stuck at dbs la.

Brother, of course CEO of Breadtalk is better than analyst at FAANG la. These kind of thing no need say de. you retarded or wat

But we are talking about average joe here, if a candidate with 5 years exp in Goldman vs a candidate with 5 years in dbs, you can bet your ass the HR will throw out the thrash dbs resume.

Cope harder if you think otherwise.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

No wonder you stuck at dbs la.

Brother, of course CEO of Breadtalk is better than analyst at FAANG la. These kind of thing no need say de. you retarded or wat

But we are talking about average joe here, if a candidate with 5 years exp in Goldman vs a candidate with 5 years in dbs, you can bet your ass the HR will throw out the thrash dbs resume.

Cope harder if you think otherwise.

So literally your point that you made way earlier is too shallow without context of the role etc.
I think we can agree, paper to paper for the EXACT same role and years of experience, HR would prefer to INTERVIEW the Goldman sach etc. no doubt. Doesn’t mean Goldman sach pays better (only for front office they obviously do. For like HR and whatever else it’s literally like the same, but their bonus is only 1 month)

But in reality that doesn’t happen often right. Going to DBS to do software engineering is way better than going to Goldman sach and stuck at BAU MIS.

Originally Posted by Unregistered

No wonder you stuck at dbs la.

Brother, of course CEO of Breadtalk is better than analyst at FAANG la. These kind of thing no need say de. you retarded or wat

But we are talking about average joe here, if a candidate with 5 years exp in Goldman vs a candidate with 5 years in dbs, you can bet your ass the HR will throw out the thrash dbs resume.

Cope harder if you think otherwise.

Btw I’m not “stuck” in DBS. I’m in Morgan Stanley Ops. That’s why I know the brand matters only if you get good roles. No point go bulge bracket but do ops legit. You can’t progress and you can’t jump anywhere. I rather go like a smaller brand firm but do a better role like AI and ML

Originally Posted by Unregistered

So literally your point that you made way earlier is too shallow without context of the role etc.
I think we can agree, paper to paper for the EXACT same role and years of experience, HR would prefer to INTERVIEW the Goldman sach etc. no doubt. Doesn’t mean Goldman sach pays better (only for front office they obviously do. For like HR and whatever else it’s literally like the same, but their bonus is only 1 month)

But in reality that doesn’t happen often right. Going to DBS to do software engineering is way better than going to Goldman sach and stuck at BAU MIS.

But never in my replies did I even talk about pay right? Why in the actual fk you keep telling me about pay?

I am talking about the prestige of the companies themselves (or in dbs’ case, the lack thereof).

Personally, having worked for 13 years, i have always chased prestige over money. Because prestige opens doors, money while important, cant secure that interview for u.

Who the fk cares you are earning 10k in dbs when HR is just going to throw your garbage resume out for a goldman sachs candidate that may only be earning 5k????

Originally Posted by Unregistered

But never in my replies did I even talk about pay right? Why in the actual fk you keep telling me about pay?

I am talking about the prestige of the companies themselves (or in dbs’ case, the lack thereof).

Personally, having worked for 13 years, i have always chased prestige over money. Because prestige opens doors, money while important, cant secure that interview for u.

Who the fk cares you are earning 10k in dbs when HR is just going to throw your garbage resume out for a goldman sachs candidate that may only be earning 5k????

I’m a HR from JP Morgan, and you can’t be more wrong…
We don’t just “throw” resumes out based on their company branding. And to be honest, DBS brand in the banking sector is really good in Singapore, no one would throw it away. Both Goldman and DBS would get through resume screening, then it’s down to the individual once it reaches interview rounds.

OOOOF arrogant boy getting rekted on all fronts of his argument. Kenna wrecked on pay argument, now kenna rekted by HR also on prestige front.
Keep your narrow view of life to you bro hehehe, hope your “prestige” can satisfy your family lifestyle AAHAHAHAHA

Btw, if you don’t like DBS so much, just simply F off from this forum? Like lollll no brainer right? Come here kpkb even though you don’t like the company? Just dumb and waste of life AHAHAHHA just a L no life attention seeker GG.

Why is there so much argument on this forum?
Btw just my 2 cents, to the dude who says he has been working 13 years, then why are you on a fresh grad forum throwing toxicity around o.O
And I don’t think as someone working 13 years, that it is financially wise to pick Goldman sachs for 5k just for prestige, where you still need to interview and jump, when you can just take 10k DBS and live comfortably without even needing to interview out. Prestige can’t feed you bro

Originally Posted by Unregistered

Lmfaoooooo this guy legit damn dumb fk. He is like a small frog in a well GAHAHAH.
I have a friend who’s in Goldman Sach operations and technology, his entry pay is 5k. He say no much progression available, and his increment 2-3% per year. Worst off is need to OT af. So lmfaooooo those big brands don’t mean **** if your opportunities in them is ****. Worst off is you cannot jump to other places cos you stuck in that function LOL

Wa 5k for Goldman Sach? That is honestly way lower than expected. Is he at least able to jump companies for a higher pay?