Rdy for part b results?
|
When are the Part B results coming out? When will firms start offering retention?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
no it does not suck to be me. i want to be me. cheers |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Past years were 8 Mar and 21 Mar |
Quote:
|
anyone heard of watiga before? seems like rubbish reviews on glassdoor
|
Quote:
|
How’s the NQ pay at withers? Higher than Big 4?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Can someone explain to me in simple terms what is so bad about frontloading practice?
At the end of the day, no difference to non-front-loaded structure if you compare your total comp on an annual basis right. Plus, isn't it better to get your bonus component sooner rather than later? You can do more with it earlier, like put more in a HYSA account or invest it or whatever. Anything I'm missing? |
Quote:
Good thing about front-loaded is if you decide you want to quit halfway, you already received some of your bonus. (every month your pay includes your front loaded bonus) Bad thing about front-loaded is that your salary is not really as high as it is. Eg: With the performance you made that year, the firm pays you 30k at end of financial year as a bonus. But the bonus you will actually receive from that "30k" is only 6k. because the "24k" has already been paid to you throughout the year in your monthly salary. This means that on paper your salary is "high" and "competitive" but in actual fact it is low and dependent on you performing well. tldr: you are only getting 60-80% of the remuneration they offered when signing the employment contract. |
Quote:
wow did not expect such a good explanation in a forum like this. to add on to what this guy/girl said ^, if you get 10k front loaded, means you actually only earn 7-8k per month, and the 2k + you get per month is actually based on your performance. if you get 10k no front load, means you earn 10k per month, and you still get the full bonus based on your performance. front load sucks. |
Quote:
I feel like this is a circular argument. The same can be said for the firm to have paid your bonus despite you not hitting your billables/under your billables. But I guess emotionally / coming from the POV of how you might feel, your “base pay” is not that far off your admin staff counter parts. Only real downside I can see is precisely that the front load portion being a “bonus”, the firm is at liberty to claw it back when you decide to leave. |
Hi all,
Is R and T the only firm which provides a 'retention bonus' to trainees who are retained? Anyone knows how much is this bonus? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Front load is just annoying when they say your pay is comparable to your international firm friends but come bonus season you are behind. |
Does anyone know the trainee pay for HSF singapore's training contract?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
If anyone has trouble hitting billables maybe they should re-evaluate if practise is for them because its literally the basic bare minimum. Of course there will be months where you feel burnt out or have family issues to resolve but thats probably only 1 out of 12 months so your point is kinda invalid. Its not a circular argument imo. Front loaded is bs and we need to stop defending it. |
Quote:
But that's the thing though. I still haven't really seen any compelling reason which clearly explains why frontloading is such a bs practice. On an annual comp basis, if one gets "$X" in total for the entire year, does it really matter whether "$X" is divided between higher monthly and lower end year bonus, vs lower monthly and higher end year bonus? |
Anyone can point me to the post that Jerald Foo made a while ago warning of the perils of joining an international firm? I think it makes for excellent reading that all that glitters is not gold.
|
may i ask the law students out there: does a tenancy agreement require a court order to be enforced, in the event of refusal of rent payment by tenant?
if clause states "if rent unpaid for seven days [...] landlord shall be entitled to immediate take possession of the premises" |
Quote:
But if firms were to pay $4,500 per month, no one would join. So to entice young associates, they pay $6,000 for instance. But the $1,500 is frontloaded. Which means when you get your bonus of 2-3 months, it is based on the $4,500 per month. So if you calculated $4,500 x 3 months (bonus) it’s equal to $13,500 which is 2.25 months on $6,000 salary. In firms that don’t practice front load, it means your bonus of 3-4 months is based on $7,500. That’s the meaning |
Quote:
|
When SILE releasing part B results?
|
Quote:
Unless you're in DSC team or some hard charging team, few big local firms really splash out bonuses based on discrete / measurable targets. It's all very nebulous and non transparent. |
Does failing Part B affect retention in B4? I am quite worried.
|
Quote:
|
Do u guys know part b passing rate
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Admission and background declaration
What do you think of those that disclosed their prior misdeeds during admission and had their names splashed all over the papers? Even for those that were granted admission, do you think they will ever find employment in the legal industry? Why are such admission decisions published only recently during the last few years and not previously during the prior decades?
|
What is the street view on Danny Quah of CHP law?
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 07:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2