Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272352)

Not a govtechie, what is MMF?

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272365)

And that’s how ppl left their own responsibility to the team while keeping themselves high profile, wasting all their time for “marketing” to senior management and get promoted, knn

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272314)

In my division, perms are asked to go while ARs are asked to stay, regardless of their past present or perceived future output/outcome. This is the case even when perms are better at work, more competent and take greater responsibilities. Obviously we don’t have a budget issue or timeline issue or quality issues but MMF issues but no one dares to question this ridiculous constraint that drives everyone crazy. Wonder if I should just write to PM Lee to complain about this. After all, is this a good use of tax payer money? Or should I just write to WP and see if this will be brought up for parliament debate?

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272438)

Manpower framework

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272562)

Lead Engineer
Current employee, more than 10 years

Pros
Work life balance in general

Cons
Missing direction from the new CE

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272562)

Lead Engineer
Current employee, more than 10 years

Pros
Work life balance in general

Cons
Missing direction from the new CE

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272621)

Not just CE but PS Joseph said the same. Have to reach the target set by mof so its harsh truth

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272634)

They are probably cutting by normal attrition. That means letting the contracts expire and they will not renew them.
Some say that it is because there is some fat to be trimmed.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272634)

They are probably cutting by normal attrition. That means letting the contracts expire and they will not renew them.
Some say that it is because there is some fat to be trimmed.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272663)

Tbh, I feel should just be the bad guy and just cut them off. Faster cut faster start over. No matter what ppl will still oppose and make noise.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272663)

Tbh, I feel should just be the bad guy and just cut them off. Faster cut faster start over. No matter what ppl will still oppose and make noise.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272666)

To quote the Borg, "Resistance is futile!".
If they dismiss immediately, they will need to compensate in lieu of notice.
Govt agencies tend to go for natural attrition.
It is more humane.
People can still resign before end of contract but the contract period is honoured.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272700)

good, cut all the weak out

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272751)

too simple too naive ((;

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272757)

Tiagong, bonus not so good. Hence govtech con been delay cause internally planning how to manage the outburst later

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272757)

Tiagong, bonus not so good. Hence govtech con been delay cause internally planning how to manage the outburst later

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272759)

Where u hear from? Trustable? CE should fight for us.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272758)

Obviously they are trying to make people leave on their own. If still gives out good bonus, nobody would leave. Simply lower the quantum then those who cannot accept will quit.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272768)

CE should take lead to cut SLM bonus

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272757)

Tiagong, bonus not so good. Hence govtech con been delay cause internally planning how to manage the outburst later

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272758)

Obviously they are trying to make people leave on their own. If still gives out good bonus, nobody would leave. Simply lower the quantum then those who cannot accept will quit.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272768)

CE should take lead to cut SLM bonus

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272771)

Other ministry/stat board got lower the quantum

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272757)

Tiagong, bonus not so good. Hence govtech con been delay cause internally planning how to manage the outburst later

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272771)

Other ministry/stat board got lower the quantum

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272769)

To see who leave first and then can do reorg to further cut cost? Brilliant!!!

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272776)

typo, missing the symbol
Other ministry/stat board got lower the quantum?

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272757)

Tiagong, bonus not so good. Hence govtech con been delay cause internally planning how to manage the outburst later

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272700)

good, cut all the weak out

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272757)

Tiagong, bonus not so good. Hence govtech con been delay cause internally planning how to manage the outburst later

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272799)

will 2024 have mdr adjustment?

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272813)

yes , i heard to be adjusted downwards in line with industry and economic factors

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272797)

with GST 9%, Cost of Living in Singapore increase drastically for Electricity bills, Transportation fees, Property prices, Food, Daily grocery etc...how to survive?

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 272798)

Unfortunately, it is not about weak or strong.
It is about perm or temp.
There could be strong ones among the temp.
But they may not get contracts renewed.