Quote:
The opportunities are there for students to use. It is whether they want to use them. Maybe SIM students are less competitive and more laid back when it comes to career planning. Somebody in this thread pointed out that most SIM students are about half to one year behind the hiring cycle as compared to the local uni students, who are already full force into the job hunt by the semester 2 of year 3. They also pad up their resumes long before that with internships and attachments. There are opportunities to be seized and made use of. The school can only do so much. In fact, SIM students should be more on the ball in bettering their prospects since their school reputation already puts them at a disadvantage. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
There is some truth to this post, subtle undertones aside, not just for SIM but for a lot of pte uni grads. I have heard a few first account anecdotes from relatives and friends that many employers (especially GLCs) tend to offer pte grads a diploma holder's position with promises of progression to a full uni grad's position after a few years. Why pay $X to a diploma holder when you can get a uni grad, albeit from a pte institution, for the same price? |
Quote:
banking, WM FO. |
Everyone is going about speculating on things like career planning, school marketing, administration office, interview skills etc. to explain the vast difference in starting pay between private universities and the local ones.
Actually the most obvious and straight forward reason is there - generally speaking private grads are just not as good as local ones. Think about it, why do big MNCs always hire only local grads? Is it because they are dumb and get taken in by smart marketing? They personally dislike private uni so discriminate against them? For some reason they want to incur bigger cost to hire a local grad when there is a cheaper alternative that can do the same from private uni? These MNCs have long history, decades of experience hiring, and have seen millions of applicants all over the world. They don't do stupid things for no reason, all they care is profit and paying the least for the best. And they have assessed that it is more value added for them to offer a 4k job to a local grad then throw 2.8k to a private caliber candidate. Why is this so? Simply because NUS has a better career management office? You can disagree with them, but that is more or less the market consensus at the end of the day. It is a far more dollars and cents rationale decision from extensive business experience companies have rather than just bias or blinded by slick marketing or interview tactics as some here seem to be implying. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I came from poly btw, so have quite a number of SIM/pte uni friends. their attitude towards their careers are in stark contrast to those from the local unis. many of my friends don't even think about jobs/internships at all until AFTER they graduate. guys and girls, whether you're from a local or private uni, start job hunting a year before you graduate; be a little more hungry. |
Quote:
some people in my course with 2nd upper and most people with FCH are getting >4k easily. 4.5k is also quite common among my friends. but all of these cases do not make up even 50% of local uni grads, so it's not reflected in the GES |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2