Today 12:30 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Can't say for sure. Just anecdotally... Was a mixed bag experience in my last interaction with them. Some really good ones from dunno which local software engineering group, but problems arise when it comes to remote offshore squads with diff timezone (we all know where it is).
Squads from around this region with same timezone seems to be more decent and some can match the really good ones here. Cost is a factor ba.
|
No surprise, SG tech sector is a joke just full of dog devs.
Even FAANG like Google, Meta etc that are SG based all work on dogcrap projects that no one gives a f about while the devs in the US region get to work on upcoming and high traffic projects.
|
Today 11:51 AM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Dont push blame to offshore squad lehs. Locally also so many CMI ones. Pui
|
You should re-read. I didn't say all 100% local ones are great, I said "some" seems really good. And not offshore are hopeless either.
|
Today 11:37 AM |
Unregistered |
i think Some h&ps project is gd
can somebody share?
|
Yesterday 09:21 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Can't say for sure. Just anecdotally... Was a mixed bag experience in my last interaction with them. Some really good ones from dunno which local software engineering group, but problems arise when it comes to remote offshore squads with diff timezone (we all know where it is).
Squads from around this region with same timezone seems to be more decent and some can match the really good ones here. Cost is a factor ba.
|
Dont push blame to offshore squad lehs. Locally also so many CMI ones. Pui
|
Yesterday 08:43 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
to be fair Accenture in the US is way better, their interviews are stricter etc, SG accenture is a dogpile, anyhow hire that's why in SG accenture is seem as a joke even though it's a F500 tech company that's respected in MCOL areas of the US.
|
Can't say for sure. Just anecdotally... Was a mixed bag experience in my last interaction with them. Some really good ones from dunno which local software engineering group, but problems arise when it comes to remote offshore squads with diff timezone (we all know where it is).
Squads from around this region with same timezone seems to be more decent and some can match the really good ones here. Cost is a factor ba.
|
Yesterday 05:27 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Lol first time I heard "expected Accenture to be top notch"
Which well you crawled out from sia 😆
|
to be fair Accenture in the US is way better, their interviews are stricter etc, SG accenture is a dogpile, anyhow hire that's why in SG accenture is seem as a joke even though it's a F500 tech company that's respected in MCOL areas of the US.
|
Yesterday 04:10 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
You can't say NCS is worse because I've recently worked on a project with Accenture, and the engineers there were also not up to par. I expected Accenture to be top-notch, but there was no difference. They take high pay but still aren't what I expected because I always thought Accenture was the best in SI. At least when I work with NCS, they can handle every JIALAT project, but with Accenture, when it comes to JIALAT projects, they're not as good as NCS.
|
Lol first time I heard "expected Accenture to be top notch"
Which well you crawled out from sia 😆
|
Yesterday 02:51 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
By doing data patch , instead of code fixes ?
|
The engineers I met seem like the type who only memorize exam dumps and don't know what to do in a dynamic environment. They don't know how to find solutions, like googling if something doesn't work. Instead, they just act clueless, waiting, and ask the client what to do. I'm not sure what's happened to Accenture's candidates nowadays, maybe it's just an isolated case, but this is how I feel, especially since I've been told Accenture is the best SI among all.
|
Yesterday 02:50 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
By doing data patch , instead of code fixes ?
|
The engineer I met seem like the type who only memorize exam dumps and don't know what to do in a dynamic environment. They don't know how to find solutions, like googling if something doesn't work. Instead, they just act clueless, waiting, and ask the client what to do. I'm not sure what's happened to Accenture's candidates nowadays, maybe it's just an isolated case, but this is how I feel, especially since I've been told Accenture is the best SI among all.
|
Yesterday 12:29 PM |
Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
You can't say NCS is worse because I've recently worked on a project with Accenture, and the engineers there were also not up to par. I expected Accenture to be top-notch, but there was no difference. They take high pay but still aren't what I expected because I always thought Accenture was the best in SI. At least when I work with NCS, they can handle every JIALAT project, but with Accenture, when it comes to JIALAT projects, they're not as good as NCS.
|
By doing data patch , instead of code fixes ?
|