Insults and beating help to bring justice to theft victims? Did you accidentally mix something wrong into your vape liquid?

I didn't realise this was a thread about legislative or legal careers.

To answer your question, obviously the solution is to sentence all of them to death by firing squad. Stupid boomer.

will it be unfavourable towards an officer during ranking if he/she

- rejects workload due to already being overloaded
- expresses interest to leave the school via open/closed posting, further studies, secondment etc?

it would be helpful if real truthful responses by those who have sat through ranking can be provided...rather than just politically correct (by-right) answers of what should be done during ranking

i am also curious as to whether the input of geo4 and 5 KPs will really be taken into consideration during ranking

When is open posting starting?

These are all questions that you can answer yourself.

If you reject workload, consider the impact of your other work. Is your other work making impact that meets the expectation at the appropriate column in your KRAs? If you believe so, explain clearly in your EPMS form and convince your RO during your mid-year work review and your various conversations. Bottom line: impact is what matters. If you reject workload and this directly causes a visible or measurable decrease in impact of your work, don't expect a B or A grade.

If you are going to leave, are you leaving on good terms or bad? Do you go around telling everyone that you can't wait to f off from the school because of (insert person/people you don't like)? Or do you explain that you are leaving to grow and develop yourself in other areas so as to contribute better to education yada yada? Do you leave the bridges intact, or do you light them on fire when you confirm that you are leaving?

No comments on ranking. Ranking panel behaviour differs from school to school, even if they adhere to all procedures and regulations.

Please provide an answer then.

Otherwise just fluff, enabling the next generation of criminals and teaching them that they can act with impunity.

Well, these are actual crimes that are happening in schools on a daily basis.

So the victims are supposed to be when the person who harmed them are let off with counselling?

If someone gets beaten up in public, have their things stolen in public, or kena outrage of modesty in public, the culprit goes to jail.

Meanwhile for victims of such crimes which happens in schools, the culprit is let off with mere counselling.

So much fairness. So much respect for the law.

if only consequences were logical, and they were imposed.

How many times are the rules in the student handbook actually enforced, or bend to give offenders 2nd, 3rd, 4th or then nth chance at the expense of others in a school community?

Any one don’t need to go to Sch at all next week?

Hi, may I know if I’m GEO 2 (2015) with salary 4500, 8 years working experiences, is’t reasonable?