Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277799)

POD take in new thinking from others. Extrcted from a PIC team member's linkedin profile:

"In my expanding role, I contribute to strategic investments and process enhancements across the government, and play a key role in redefining performance management within GovTech.
...
...
Partnered with GovTech to overhaul performance evaluation processes, advocating for a shift towards schema-based behavioural assessments and initiating pilots across the agency, impacting over 4000 staff members."

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277817)

Lol partnered with govtech. Simi ****

Dont they realise they are now govtechie. Say like they are outsider and giving consultancy

Pui

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277818)

its linkedin ... everyone knows its just the corporate equivalent of tinder profiles

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277822)

The schema based thing has not been rolled out yet and won't be rolled out so soon, but there's already work in the background being done to trial it, so just wait and see. TBH it's not a bad thing despite its origins.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277822)

The schema based thing has not been rolled out yet and won't be rolled out so soon, but there's already work in the background being done to trial it, so just wait and see. TBH it's not a bad thing despite its origins.

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277826)

even more perplexed how a senior manager from indeed can come in as a DD and promote to D in less than a year

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277826)

even more perplexed how a senior manager from indeed can come in as a DD and promote to D in less than a year

Originally Posted by Unregistered (Post 277832)

new APA said senior level required 2 performance ratings for promotion? again, double standard. pui