Unregistered |
26-04-2024 10:10 PM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
(Post 276704)
LJ lah you. Can bother to post to create fear that people can be “unmasked” but got no time to say how it happens, when anyone with a common sense knows is not possible without illegal means. You think you can fool people here just because you can talk nonsense to FIs and force things down their throat?
|
I just chip in on the last sentence as the rest of your post is too funny.
1. So far most of the MAS officers I know have a pretty cordial relationship with their FI counterparts. (Not all, some of the older ones still prefer to keep arms length distance - story for another day - but there was some feedback before that generally younger ones are friendlier). And this must be the case because we ask so much information from them. Not just what is required as part of regulatory returns but all the extras to answer bosses questions (especially when they are new heh heh heh). Imagine if one day your FI compliance or risk management decides it’s not necessary provide you the extent of detail you ask for becos it’s not required by regs or guidelines! How will you write your long internal report!
2. You’re prob underestimating FIs if you think they will meekly accept “nonsense” talk. I have encountered FIs who are more than able to hold their own in a discussion with robust views instead of simply acquiescing.
3. It’s also prob unwise for anyone to act as you described, since every now and then mas folks will resign and try to join industry, now suppose someone has a lousy reputation as the mas liaison, do you think any FI worth their salt will want to onboard them? (whether they can perform after taking off the mas hat is a separate matter)
|