Salary.sg Forums - View Single Post - LTA (Land Transport Authority)
View Single Post
  #60 (permalink)  
Old 29-02-2016, 11:14 AM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Look like it is right that NUS start to have compulsory modules for their year 1 to prepare them for industry. This statement already state that our local grad doesn't know how important it is to have hands on skills (which doesn't always equivalent to technical skills) apart from academic knowledge. You may sCore well in your academic, but doesn't mean you can visualize things in work. SIT is new, but that doesn't mean they will always be lower then nus/ntu/smu. No point arguing much because time will prove and look at the market, it's infact already start showing competitiveness is market. If NUS/NTU grad still wanna argue, i think it is best to look back at their cohort, the booming FT in both uni already proved one thing, the reason why both uni can rise their world ranking is mostly depending on those FT research papers and them having significant breakthrough in scientific and technological field. If today both uni purely depend on local students, where do you think we will stand in the world? Instead of bashing other uni grads, why not us local students look back at ourselves? How much breakthrough can we make without having FT around in all those field? This is the ugly truth.
SIT students will always think that they are getting the same standard as NUS/NTU just because SIT is named under local Uni. I never say SIT is bad, I am trying to say that you can't compare SIT standard with NUS/NTU as one guy posted that it's equivalently hard to get second upper.Nope, SIT will never attain the same standard as NUS/NTU unless they enroll more foreign scholar and implement bell curve. Like what you say, local uni depends on foreign talent, you should know how smart they are. So do you think it's fair to compare between NUS/NTU with SIT.
Reply With Quote