Originally Posted by Unregistered

So many words just to say nothing. I guess it’s the hallmark of being a lawyer right.

How exactly is the 2022 batch the “batch was the guinea pig batch for SILE to trial and error with the new syllabus and exam format etc.”? 2022 syllabus got change meh? So your worries were predicated on the uncertainty of passing rate and exam format? If so, how is that detrimental, substantially, given that the examinable content remains unchanged? As you’ve eluded to, “If the examiners decide to change it from open-ended to MCQ the night before the exam, it should not really be a matter of concern. If you know your stuff, you will pass.”

Nobody is disputing that the pre-revised syllabus is procedural and in that sense, seemingly a rite of passage. It’s pretty much industry knowledge at this point.

What is in contention is that post-revision, the additional syllabuses included are not necessarily procedural based. Coupled with the sheer amount of addition and the fact that candidates no longer get a choice and are forced to take on niche modules with little to no relevance to an aspiring practitioner.

Even taking your point that the post-revised part b is indeed procedural based, the increase in number of examined subjects (9 to 31) is manageable in your mind? Putting aside the efficacy of such methodology, I sincerely doubt it that is the case.

“I understand that the Part B course 2023 has an increased number of modules, and since I have not taken a look at how in depth each module is, I will not be commenting on how challenging it is” - but isn’t your entire post just to **** on people who are complaining and to subtle flex that you’ve passed the bar having only studied a month before the exam?