Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
In case you’re not being facetious, don’t think that’s fair for a local outfit. To my mind, what’s fair would be legal exec pay for the latter half. After all you’re technically already called to the bar under the new regime. You ought to be able to sign off documents as a member of the bar. At the very least, rendering emails advice.
To be paying such meagre sum is really top level exploitation
|
Under the new regime, everybody (aspiring practitioners, in-house counsel, legal academics) will be called/admitted as a "Lawyer (Non-Practitioner)"
By definition, in order to practise law, aspiring practitioners would need to get a practising certificate (presumably by completing RLT/PTC components) in order to actually practise law.
If this is the case, what is the point of being called to being called/admitted as a "Lawyer (Non-Practitioner)"?