Exactly. Listen to the idiot above who has already decided IR is guilty based on.. what? The words of some loon who rants to his 1k followers every night who will press like on basically anything which is anti-PAP?

There is literally 0 concrete direct evidence that IR has done anything so far. Nobody has stepped forward to say "IR did this to me." Even the so-called "accounts" are written anonymously, could have been written by anyone.

I am not advocating for IR here, but some of you really are not fit to be lawyers.