Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Agree with everything except that NUS = SMU. They are not on the same pedestal.
NUS is WAY ahead of SMU. Oxbridge is definitely > SMU.
NUS is definitely not > Oxbridge: arguments might be made for parity but that’s about as far as it goes. NUS is definitely > LSE/UCL because NUS admissions is 3x more restrictive than LSE/UCL. |
Only right in the Singapore Law context.
Prospects wise in both international and SG law firms (combined) Cam/Ox/
LSE/UCL likely better than
NUS. Same reasoning as above. No one is likely to care about your prowess in Singapore law alone in an international law firm.
Prospects wise in SG law firms (solo) -
NUS = Oxbridge(?)/
LSE/UCL/
SMU
Prospects wise in international law firms (solo) - Oxbridge/
LSE/UCL/
NUS/
SMU
NUS admissions say nothing about prospects. The admission rate means jack when candidate profile is the same (your straight As,
HCI/
RI person). So does QS rankings, since that involves international repute.