Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Career as Teacher

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

Thread: Career as Teacher Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 02:10 PM
Unregistered
Query

Although MOE highlights that the last day of a term is Eat with Your Family Day, my school activated this emergency relay messaging the very next day (Saturday). Some staff did not mange to response in time to the relay system as it was a weekend message.

May I know if this is something according to the HR protocol? Is is this something activated because ranking is near? Some trs on the ground are feeling anxious as the school culture has not been too positive....
Today 12:51 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
teaching is a job for rejects la. cannot get into medicine dentisty law engineering accounting business.... then bobian go into teaching lor

hence usually teachers were once poor students with subpar results.. some even delinquents who were once retainees in school and uni. cannot help it one la... low quality nobodies produce low quality nobodies lor, the vicious cycle continues

much unlike drs and lawyers.. once upon a time they were the cream of the crop, then marry their fellow drs and lawyers, produce outstanding offspring who then study med or law and the cycle also continue this way

such is life really
This used to be true 20 years ago. But these days to even enter nie, the 10th percentile for science (education) is ABC, compared to CCD for engineering. Even accountancy and business 10th percentile is BBC
Yesterday 11:12 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
You don’t sound like an EO colleague and I hope you’re not posting only to stir up unnecessary drama. To start with, STs are two steps below DD. The equivalent to DD is MTT.

Yes we have a lot of ground experience but that does not translate automatically to policymaking expertise. Like it or not, if you choose to take up a policy role, you are starting from scratch alongside direct hires on the MX scale. It’s normal to report to ADs and DDs who have been in the line and have greater domain knowledge. The track you seek to pursue thereafter (extend HQ stint, convert to MX, return to SD) is up to you.
can you share your experience working under these non-EO policy DDs and ADs?
Yesterday 09:32 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
yeah lor so good hor? go try lor.
teaching is a job for rejects la. cannot get into medicine dentisty law engineering accounting business.... then bobian go into teaching lor

hence usually teachers were once poor students with subpar results.. some even delinquents who were once retainees in school and uni. cannot help it one la... low quality nobodies produce low quality nobodies lor, the vicious cycle continues

much unlike drs and lawyers.. once upon a time they were the cream of the crop, then marry their fellow drs and lawyers, produce outstanding offspring who then study med or law and the cycle also continue this way

such is life really
Yesterday 08:19 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Education content rarely updated. Teachers just memorize and teach. Thats jt.

Mark some papers then get aim for promotion. Easy .
yeah lor so good hor? go try lor.
Yesterday 07:28 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I find it extremely insulting that hardworking and experienced teachers need to report to young non-teachers in the policy wings.

Shouldn't teachers, with our wealth of ground experience, be in charge of the policy wings? Senior Teachers should be the DDs at policy wings, and the non-teachers should just remain as officers unless they convert to EOs and gain ground experience.

Has anyone worked at the policy wings before? Are the young non-teachers occupying the DD and AD positions any good?
You don’t sound like an EO colleague and I hope you’re not posting only to stir up unnecessary drama. To start with, STs are two steps below DD. The equivalent to DD is MTT.

Yes we have a lot of ground experience but that does not translate automatically to policymaking expertise. Like it or not, if you choose to take up a policy role, you are starting from scratch alongside direct hires on the MX scale. It’s normal to report to ADs and DDs who have been in the line and have greater domain knowledge. The track you seek to pursue thereafter (extend HQ stint, convert to MX, return to SD) is up to you.
Yesterday 07:06 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I would guess yes, that would be the case - but I've never been an SL, so this is just a guess on my part.

Logically though, if say the HOD/HUM has no Geog expertise, but the YH is able to help with that… there will be less need to raise a SH/Geog?
Depends. YH is a very taxing job, it would be very challenging for the YH to take on some of the SH IP task. In such instances, it would be likely that an SH/Geog would be needed.
Yesterday 07:00 PM
Unregistered
why are teachers not prioritised in Policy Wing?

I find it extremely insulting that hardworking and experienced teachers need to report to young non-teachers in the policy wings.

Shouldn't teachers, with our wealth of ground experience, be in charge of the policy wings? Senior Teachers should be the DDs at policy wings, and the non-teachers should just remain as officers unless they convert to EOs and gain ground experience.

Has anyone worked at the policy wings before? Are the young non-teachers occupying the DD and AD positions any good?
Yesterday 02:24 PM
Unregistered
Teacher easy job

Education content rarely updated. Teachers just memorize and teach. Thats jt.

Mark some papers then get aim for promotion. Easy .
Yesterday 10:27 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Does this mean that, if a department already has many different (IP and non IP) KPs in there e.g. half of the department is made up of KPs, it is less likely for the younger teachers in that department to obtain a KP position?
I would guess yes, that would be the case - but I've never been an SL, so this is just a guess on my part.

Logically though, if say the HOD/HUM has no Geog expertise, but the YH is able to help with that… there will be less need to raise a SH/Geog?
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 03:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2