Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

Thread: Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 04:39 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Bruh source? I literally got my own personal source what u on lmao
For A1
Blue is 4.35
Yellow unknown not revealed yet
Orange and black 4.1

Don't listen to other nonsense amount the others saying lol unless they meant direct A2
Today 04:37 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
bruh you are HR in KPMG? so many ppl got offered $4.5k as A1 in kpmg
Bruh source? I literally got my own personal source what u on lmao
Today 03:59 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
1) Yes, back then, there were still many batchmates going to the Big 4, so the comparison is not that bad.
2) Touch your heart, confirm you searched the MOM website before. But we are bloody not covered. The law doesn’t protect us, lmao.
3) Yeah, In recent years, the exit opportunities haven't been very good even after slogging for three years.
4) Enduring works if it’s for good prospects, but what if you are enduring for nothing? Going back to point 3.
Typo * haven’t
Today 03:58 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Nah vouching work isn’t the issue.

It’s the compensation, hours, and prospects

1) Compensation - starting salaries in other industries is higher. Their peers are earning more, going on holidays, posting on IG. It’s social media era now, everyone wants to compare.

2) Hours - Gen Z thinks this working to peak hours is just nonsense and won’t stand for it. I have juniors that asked me whether we are all sheep, how is it that no one in history of B4 has ever complained to MOM when asked to work such long hours.

3) Prospects - Internally, as A1, they see their SA1s still slogging and can easily imagine that to be their future selves. They don’t want a future like this for themselves. Externally, the exit opportunities into a cushy job isn’t as attractive when you have to still slog for 3 years and pass SCAQ.

4) In the past we say “just tahan for 3 years only”, but now they want “holy god have to slog for a WHOLE THREE years”. People are more impatient and crave instant gratification while Big4 model has always been delayed gratification. Doesn’t work anymore.
1) Yes, back then, there were still many batchmates going to the Big 4, so the comparison is not that bad.
2) Touch your heart, confirm you searched the MOM website before. But we are bloody not covered. The law doesn’t protect us, lmao.
3) Yeah, in recent years, the exit opportunities have been very good even after slogging for 3 years.
4) Enduring works if it’s for good prospects, but what if you are enduring for nothing? Going back to point 3.
Today 03:57 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Then stay until you're a manager. Whether you are capable or not, you still have to start from the bottom. Even if you do multiple internships, you also start from the bottom. They don’t consider your experience unless your internship is with the respective Big Four and you meet the requirements.

There are also other choices available. You can try for manager roles upon graduation, but you probably have to be an FCH.
FCH in the BBC batch not comparable to FCH in the AAA batch.
Today 03:49 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
It depends on how prevalent they are in the organization to change how things work.

Now still many boomers and hardworking fts. So not likely to change
Junior partners don’t have enough power to change the system.
Senior partners just waiting to retire and have little incentive to change the system.

Unless you have someone able to rally up the voting power of the junior and mid level partners.
Today 03:48 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I suspect Gen Z doesn't like vouching work.

They feel they are so smart and they want to sit Senior Manager / Partner position?
Nah vouching work isn’t the issue.

It’s the compensation, hours, and prospects

1) Compensation - starting salaries in other industries is higher. Their peers are earning more, going on holidays, posting on IG. It’s social media era now, everyone wants to compare.

2) Hours - Gen Z thinks this working to peak hours is just nonsense and won’t stand for it. I have juniors that asked me whether we are all sheep, how is it that no one in history of B4 has ever complained to MOM when asked to work such long hours.

3) Prospects - Internally, as A1, they see their SA1s still slogging and can easily imagine that to be their future selves. They don’t want a future like this for themselves. Externally, the exit opportunities into a cushy job isn’t as attractive when you have to still slog for 3 years and pass SCAQ.

4) In the past we say “just tahan for 3 years only”, but now they want “holy god have to slog for a WHOLE THREE years”. People are more impatient and crave instant gratification while Big4 model has always been delayed gratification. Doesn’t work anymore.
Today 03:44 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
From 2010 up until 2016 maybe.

Now 2024… they just want money and work life, right to disconnect from work.
It depends on how prevalent they are in the organization to change how things work.

Now still many boomers and hardworking fts. So not likely to change
Today 03:41 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
My interpretation of recent events is that the young generation, by collectively boycotting the accounting industry and a career in accounting, has indirectly “forced the hand” of the boomers to raise salaries.

A single student has no bargaining power; but the collective power of Gen Z has made this happen.

So yea, change up the way things work or risk losing new blood.

Without fresh blood any industry also cannot sustain.
Conspiracy theory: it’s for the ep renewal
Today 03:39 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Pls lah we all went thru the local uni acc degree
What makes u qualify to start as senior position ? With all the B/C average grades on report card and brain ded tick the box audit summer internship ?
Understand this is a toxic industry… but some ppl really can’t wake up the idea that u are just not the top 5or even 25% of your cohort to deserve a $10k starting pay
My interpretation of recent events is that the young generation, by collectively boycotting the accounting industry and a career in accounting, has indirectly “forced the hand” of the boomers to raise salaries.

A single student has no bargaining power; but the collective power of Gen Z has made this happen.

So yea, change up the way things work or risk losing new blood.

Without fresh blood any industry also cannot sustain.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 04:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2