Today 01:03 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
|
|
Today 12:39 AM | ||
Unregistered |
Artificial attempts to make it as prestigious as law by setting roadblocks, all backfired because nobody wants to join. Now have to gostan 1 and only thing that matters is to INCREASE PAY. nth else matters but they can't do it because audit fees alr so low and will eat into profit margins. The industry is basically trapped in a death spiral Get out while you can |
|
Yesterday 09:57 PM | ||
Unregistered | Just f off from this industry/profession. | |
Yesterday 03:19 PM | ||
Unregistered | How much is the pay now? | |
Yesterday 03:01 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
|
|
Yesterday 02:45 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
Btw they come out with clown policies again. Wooo hhaaa woo haa so long summarized in 3 lame points LOL. |
|
Yesterday 01:14 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
If next time I want to go Scotland be PA via RMA, must I study the Scotland tax system? |
|
Yesterday 10:51 AM | ||
Unregistered | But even you have to admit out of that decade, 4 years was basically a time skip arc. | |
Yesterday 10:50 AM | ||
Unregistered |
There is an identified difference between those who took pre admission course and those who took the scaq 1) the membership number difference. The new ones start with 0 while the old ones start with 7 or 8 series. So when employer ask for your membership cert, they can identify which scheme you were under. 2) the old ones not eligible for all the membership agreements with foreign professional bodies. So if you want work overseas you will have a problem. as much as I also want to take the new one, it is not feasible for someone my age already. |
|
Yesterday 10:50 AM | ||
Unregistered | A decade old | |
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |