| Today 01:03 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Artificial attempts to make it as prestigious as law by setting roadblocks, all backfired because nobody wants to join. Now have to gostan
1 and only thing that matters is to INCREASE PAY. nth else matters
but they can't do it because audit fees alr so low and will eat into profit margins.
The industry is basically trapped in a death spiral
Get out while you can
|
sad but true. as a client i can testify i feel indifferent my auditor which colour tbh?? who cheapest choose who lor better submit your bid and undercut each other liao siao
|
| Today 12:39 AM |
| Unregistered |
Artificial attempts to make it as prestigious as law by setting roadblocks, all backfired because nobody wants to join. Now have to gostan
1 and only thing that matters is to INCREASE PAY. nth else matters
but they can't do it because audit fees alr so low and will eat into profit margins.
The industry is basically trapped in a death spiral
Get out while you can
|
| Yesterday 09:57 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
How much is the pay now?
|
Just f off from this industry/profession.
|
| Yesterday 03:19 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
In orange now and friends in blue and yellow. No news of this revised salary. Source???
|
How much is the pay now?
|
| Yesterday 03:01 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
There is an identified difference between those who took pre admission course and those who took the scaq
1) the membership number difference. The new ones start with 0 while the old ones start with 7 or 8 series. So when employer ask for your membership cert, they can identify which scheme you were under.
2) the old ones not eligible for all the membership agreements with foreign professional bodies. So if you want work overseas you will have a problem.
as much as I also want to take the new one, it is not feasible for someone my age already.
|
This whole SCAQ is a joke. Most people who are inside are those who took the pre admission course without going through any professional exams. How credible is this cert? Lol. I can bet if you ask the existing CA holders to take the exams to renew the licence almost everyone will let go of this "CA qualification".
|
| Yesterday 02:45 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I am SCAQ candidate.
If next time I want to go Scotland be PA via RMA, must I study the Scotland tax system?
|
Of cos la. Ask u go jh land u also cant do tax.
Btw they come out with clown policies again. Wooo hhaaa woo haa so long summarized in 3 lame points LOL.
|
| Yesterday 01:14 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
There is an identified difference between those who took pre admission course and those who took the scaq
1) the membership number difference. The new ones start with 0 while the old ones start with 7 or 8 series. So when employer ask for your membership cert, they can identify which scheme you were under.
2) the old ones not eligible for all the membership agreements with foreign professional bodies. So if you want work overseas you will have a problem.
as much as I also want to take the new one, it is not feasible for someone my age already.
|
I am SCAQ candidate.
If next time I want to go Scotland be PA via RMA, must I study the Scotland tax system?
|
| Yesterday 10:51 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
A decade old
|
But even you have to admit out of that decade, 4 years was basically a time skip arc.
|
| Yesterday 10:50 AM |
| Unregistered |
There is an identified difference between those who took pre admission course and those who took the scaq
1) the membership number difference. The new ones start with 0 while the old ones start with 7 or 8 series. So when employer ask for your membership cert, they can identify which scheme you were under.
2) the old ones not eligible for all the membership agreements with foreign professional bodies. So if you want work overseas you will have a problem.
as much as I also want to take the new one, it is not feasible for someone my age already.
|
| Yesterday 10:50 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
To me 2013 was just a few years ago so it feels quite weird to hear people call it the OLD.
Its not that we are OLD, its that you are YOUNG.
|
A decade old
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
