Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

Thread: Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 08:33 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
As expected, orange is a lagger and remained silent about raising salaries based on the articles. Deloitte & KPMG announced salary hikes and at the very least EY and even a non big 4 RSM voiced their support on this
Many local associates resigned. It’s bad.
Today 08:23 PM
Unregistered As expected, orange is a lagger and remained silent about raising salaries based on the articles. Deloitte & KPMG announced salary hikes and at the very least EY and even a non big 4 RSM voiced their support on this
Today 08:13 PM
Unregistered Good that they are increasing salaries

Just goes to show how crazy underpaid people were all along

Also how bad are things now for them to resort to this?
Today 08:10 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by kopi o di lo View Post
Deloitte now 4.1k!

[s://.theedgesingapore.com/news/company-news/graduates-joining-deloitte-singapore-auditors-will-have-starting-monthly-salary[/
Only for associates ?
Today 08:05 PM
kopi o di lo Deloitte now 4.1k!

https://www.theedgesingapore.com/new...monthly-salary
Today 07:55 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Seem like saying or implying if a person did not take SCAQ, the SGX Listed Companies' commercial accounting department should not hire that person.

Ah, the folks in commercial accounting or finance departments of listed companies don't bother much with the Singapore Chartered Accountant Qualification (SCAQ). Their thinking goes like this, "Why bother with CA Singapore? I'm just doing commercial accounting lah! I don't need that ISCA CA (Singapore) title or go through the hassle of getting SCAQ. Only auditors aiming to become PA care about CA."

Then ISCA saying, "Okay, never mind, lor... I will tell ACRA, the regulator, that SGX listed companies must hire accountants who have ISCA CA membership to handle their accounts. Let's see if you all commercial accountants still think CA isn't necessary then!! In the future, you guys better have CA SG if you wanna touch listed company accounts."

Truly, ISCA can be quite the troublemaker, eh?
Errr, are they daydreaming again? I have seen finance managers who don’t have a CA or an accounting certification. Their talk about quality and their actions don’t match. And they should really take down any phrases like 'prestigious' on their website.
Today 07:53 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
There are aunties doing GL entry, AR or AP who have ACCA and converted to CA through the 5 days PAC without going through any professional exams. How is SCAQ prestigious? It is funny that they are considered qualified accountants when they do not even understand how financial statements work.
Exactly. Seem like ISCA want regulator to mandate a law that only ISCA SCAQ CA members then qualified to touch SGX list co accounts...

This seems discrimination to those folks who are not SCAQ CA member.
Today 07:48 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
With accounting standards and business transactions becoming increasingly complex,
accountants in in-house finance and accounting functions of companies need to be well equipped to produce accurate and high-quality financial reports and deliver valuable
financial insights to the organisation. The SCAQ, and the access it offers into the
professional accountancy body ISCA and the wealth of professional development,
networking and other resources available, ensure that

Regulators should emphasise to companies the importance of employing professionally qualified accountants in their key finance functions. This is particularly crucial in companies with high public interest such as listed companies, where accountants play a key role in assisting the company directors to discharge their fiduciary duties over their financial statements and protect the public interest
Seem like saying or implying if a person did not take SCAQ, the SGX Listed Companies' commercial accounting department should not hire that person.

Ah, the folks in commercial accounting or finance departments of listed companies don't bother much with the Singapore Chartered Accountant Qualification (SCAQ). Their thinking goes like this, "Why bother with CA Singapore? I'm just doing commercial accounting lah! I don't need that ISCA CA (Singapore) title or go through the hassle of getting SCAQ. Only auditors aiming to become PA care about CA."

Then ISCA saying, "Okay, never mind, lor... I will tell ACRA, the regulator, that SGX listed companies must hire accountants who have ISCA CA membership to handle their accounts. Let's see if you all commercial accountants still think CA isn't necessary then!! In the future, you guys better have CA SG if you wanna touch listed company accounts."

Truly, ISCA can be quite the troublemaker, eh?
Today 02:29 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Artificial attempts to make it as prestigious as law by setting roadblocks, all backfired because nobody wants to join. Now have to gostan

1 and only thing that matters is to INCREASE PAY. nth else matters

but they can't do it because audit fees alr so low and will eat into profit margins.

The industry is basically trapped in a death spiral

Get out while you can
What percentage of the audit fee is auditor’s salary?
Today 02:27 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
hahaha this profession is so cui. look at isca house, looks more like a warehouse in a B grade office building than a HQ. zero prestige profession
Lok kok place. Go there downstair eat cai png only. Sb xia suay to tell ppl im CA.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 09:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2