| Today 01:18 AM |
| Unregistered |
CM POD this td winner siol all that are due hitting 2 years or more than 1 year 8-10 months all got promoted. Think this time round got more promotees from CM POD than the other pods. All along CM POD lowest promoters so pity those people but surprising this time round so different
|
| Today 12:42 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
remember, those voucher is a one-off plaster. if promoted you will get more than the voucher monthly.
|
Got voucher?! Then those who promoted last year will get anot?
|
| Today 12:39 AM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
How would there ever be fair comparison when they are not in the same project? And what do you mean by already doing way more? If your role is a tester and you worked over the weekends to test, that is not considered as doing more. It is your role and they will only see it as either you inefficient or your leadership's planning cui, which of course the latter will never be admitted.
Do more doesnt always mean good. I learnt the hard way. Sitting at 41 MAL as CL9
|
Bro read carefully what the op is writing. He already said the cm person and his friend were in the same project before cm person went to another project
Do more and do well is good, but not do less and not well or do more but also not well. Actually CL9 they never promise by when can promote it’s typically 3-4.5 years and depend if there’s spaces above you for you to move up to
|
| Today 12:03 AM |
| Unregistered |
remember, those voucher is a one-off plaster. if promoted you will get more than the voucher monthly.
|
| Yesterday 11:24 PM |
| Unregistered |
Do you think MT kor kor will give those who missed promo some $$$ vouchers? We should all just quit and trigger some reaction from the leadership.
|
| Yesterday 11:20 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Nope the cm gurl another project one, but used to be same project. But honestly back then the ba and developer was already doing way more. Can only say the cm girl got lucky switching to another project and idk but this ti round seems like they prioritised those that hit close to 2 mal from cm pod if not I can’t understand how that cm girl got promoted given how she’s not performing well also from those on the same team/project as her
|
How would there ever be fair comparison when they are not in the same project? And what do you mean by already doing way more? If your role is a tester and you worked over the weekends to test, that is not considered as doing more. It is your role and they will only see it as either you inefficient or your leadership's planning cui, which of course the latter will never be admitted.
Do more doesnt always mean good. I learnt the hard way. Sitting at 41 MAL as CL9
|
| Yesterday 11:09 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
All same project and MAL, A to SA?
|
Nope the cm gurl another project one, but used to be same project. But honestly back then the ba and developer was already doing way more. Can only say the cm girl got lucky switching to another project and idk but this ti round seems like they prioritised those that hit close to 2 mal from cm pod if not I can’t understand how that cm girl got promoted given how she’s not performing well also from those on the same team/project as her
|
| Yesterday 10:50 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Yea it’s not based on merits one. Know of someone from change management and she got promoted this round because she exceeded the MAL already think coming to 2 years. Heard she not very good in her work, her domain knowledge weak and can’t seem to manage in the project. But still got promoted, whereas my project I know of developers and BAs who also hitting 2 years A in June but didn’t get promoted this round because not enough budget. But clearly is performing much better than the change management girl in the bank project
|
All same project and MAL, A to SA?
|
| Yesterday 10:43 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
This company always claim economy not doing well, no budget. Yet they can still hire new people.
When hiring externally, their career level is determined by their existing paycheck. That is why you can sometimes see someone not performing at their level.
You can be in accenture for years and yet it is harder to promote internally. With this hiring practice, the slots for your promotion is taken up by external hires. This issue at hand plus the huge amount backlogs of L10~L13 means the lower end of the career levels have no chance of promotion. And when they do, you will see some dubious people getting promoted.
Accenture is truly a fk up place. Good luck.
|
Yea it’s not based on merits one. Know of someone from change management and she got promoted this round because she exceeded the MAL already think coming to 2 years. Heard she not very good in her work, her domain knowledge weak and can’t seem to manage in the project. But still got promoted, whereas my project I know of developers and BAs who also hitting 2 years A in June but didn’t get promoted this round because not enough budget. But clearly is performing much better than the change management girl in the bank project
|
| Yesterday 10:39 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Funny leh you. If not you expect her to everyday say good morning, good evening, good night, I miss you to u?
|
I think op doesn’t mean that but more of how the person only reaches out when she or he needs something?? So simple cannot understand ah
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
