| Today 03:11 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
will advisory get the bump as well?
|
You so elite in advisory? Can share what’s the current pay?
Most people here from audit.
|
| Today 03:08 PM |
| Unregistered |
will advisory get the bump as well?
|
| Today 02:36 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I knew one jhb acca holder who can’t even differentiate between prepayment and accruals. Dk how she even managed to pass the interview in big4. Now you telling me they are going to be CA in the near future? Eh pls, this is like the biggest slap to our local accounting grads…
|
Doesn't matter. Because the future CA are exempted with 2 papers and also allow to do 2 papers during undergrad course.
|
| Today 02:33 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Not say look down. ISCA should relook into their current pool of CA members and determine who is actually qualified. If not, there is no credibility in this qualification at all. Those who are in commercial accounting now will see majority of the CA members are 5 days PAC batch. Like previous posts say, should not say this profession is prestigious when it is clearly not.
|
The existence of ISCA's SCAQ programme could potentially create a rift between Chartered Accountants (CAs) and non-CAs within a company.
An ISCA SCAQ CA member might hold the belief that non-CAs shouldn't be hired by SGX-Listed Companies or entrusted with accounting responsibilities because they lack the professional qualifications of a ISCA SCAQ CA.
This sentiment could lead to division among accountants in the workplace and foster an environment of animosity.
|
| Today 02:28 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
The fact that most CA members are your aunties/JHKs converting from acca via 5 days PAC doing GL entry, AR/AP already made this SCAQ a joke. Go ask every existing 5 days PAC members to retake the CA exams to renew their licence and see if they can pass.
|
The first joke is about this "Accelerated Pathway" where undergrads can attempt two SCAQ papers with ISCA's sponsorship.
The second joke is they can get two exemptions for SCAQ papers when they graduate because of the modules they've done in university.
So, when they graduate in 2028, they would have cleared four out of five SCAQ papers.
But here's the kicker, it's funny because it's kind of like the CPA exam, but back in 2013, the rule was different—it was a combo of 3 years work under ATO and 5 exams paper with zero exemptions.
|
| Today 02:27 PM |
| Unregistered |
I knew one jhb acca holder who can’t even differentiate between prepayment and accruals. Dk how she even managed to pass the interview in big4. Now you telling me they are going to be CA in the near future? Eh pls, this is like the biggest slap to our local accounting grads…
|
| Today 02:16 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Y u so innocent lol. They can say whatever crap laa but they won’t tell the truth 1
|
Even the current ep holder dont meet the minimum. Whats the woo ha. Ep up ur local also up lo. Nothing new. No local do get ft. Sal must go up so can have that exception lol.
|
| Today 02:13 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
either an overperforming A1 or a downright nub AM
|
Whats the diff from a1 to am. U dont hold port, u not involved in business development. Just doing diff section leading diff ppl. Tell me whats the diff.
|
| Today 02:01 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
And hence, it is perfectly alright to look down on those with shitty crap like ACCA
|
Not say look down. ISCA should relook into their current pool of CA members and determine who is actually qualified. If not, there is no credibility in this qualification at all. Those who are in commercial accounting now will see majority of the CA members are 5 days PAC batch. Like previous posts say, should not say this profession is prestigious when it is clearly not.
|
| Today 01:45 PM |
| Unregistered |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Huh? But the EDGE news say this "move" is in support of the Accountancy Workforce Review Committee set up by the Ministry of Finance.
In this context, the "move" means increasing the salary for fresh graduate effective from 1st September 2024.
There are a lot of suggestions in Accountancy Workforce Review Committee that firms should increase salary for fresh graudate.
So how is the the salary increment connected or motivated by the "MOM's EP Renewal Date 1st September 2024"?
|
Y u so innocent lol. They can say whatever crap laa but they won’t tell the truth 1
|
Topic Review (Newest First)
