Today 02:33 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
An ISCA SCAQ CA member might hold the belief that non-CAs shouldn't be hired by SGX-Listed Companies or entrusted with accounting responsibilities because they lack the professional qualifications of a ISCA SCAQ CA. This sentiment could lead to division among accountants in the workplace and foster an environment of animosity. |
|
Today 02:28 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
The second joke is they can get two exemptions for SCAQ papers when they graduate because of the modules they've done in university. So, when they graduate in 2028, they would have cleared four out of five SCAQ papers. But here's the kicker, it's funny because it's kind of like the CPA exam, but back in 2013, the rule was different—it was a combo of 3 years work under ATO and 5 exams paper with zero exemptions. |
|
Today 02:27 PM | ||
Unregistered | I knew one jhb acca holder who can’t even differentiate between prepayment and accruals. Dk how she even managed to pass the interview in big4. Now you telling me they are going to be CA in the near future? Eh pls, this is like the biggest slap to our local accounting grads… | |
Today 02:16 PM | ||
Unregistered | Even the current ep holder dont meet the minimum. Whats the woo ha. Ep up ur local also up lo. Nothing new. No local do get ft. Sal must go up so can have that exception lol. | |
Today 02:13 PM | ||
Unregistered | Whats the diff from a1 to am. U dont hold port, u not involved in business development. Just doing diff section leading diff ppl. Tell me whats the diff. | |
Today 02:01 PM | ||
Unregistered | Not say look down. ISCA should relook into their current pool of CA members and determine who is actually qualified. If not, there is no credibility in this qualification at all. Those who are in commercial accounting now will see majority of the CA members are 5 days PAC batch. Like previous posts say, should not say this profession is prestigious when it is clearly not. | |
Today 01:45 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
|
|
Today 01:42 PM | ||
Unregistered | either an overperforming A1 or a downright nub AM | |
Today 01:41 PM | ||
Unregistered | And hence, it is perfectly alright to look down on those with shitty crap like ACCA | |
Today 12:54 PM | ||
Unregistered |
Quote:
|
|
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread. |