Salary.sg Forums - Reply to Topic
Salary.sg Forums  

Go Back   Salary.sg Forums > The Salary.sg Discussion Forums: > Income and Jobs > Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment

Income and Jobs Discuss jobs, career options and of course salaries




Salary.sg Forums

Thread: Q: Big4 - Yearly salary increment Reply to Thread
Your Username: Click here to log in
Human Verification To prove you are a human and not a computer program that spams, please check the box below and answer any further questions if prompted.

Title:
  
Message:
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 03:19 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
In orange now and friends in blue and yellow. No news of this revised salary. Source???
How much is the pay now?
Today 03:01 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
There is an identified difference between those who took pre admission course and those who took the scaq

1) the membership number difference. The new ones start with “0” while the old ones start with “7” or “8” series. So when employer ask for your membership cert, they can identify which scheme you were under.

2) the old ones not eligible for all the membership agreements with foreign professional bodies. So if you want work overseas you will have a problem.

as much as I also want to take the new one, it is not feasible for someone my age already.
This whole SCAQ is a joke. Most people who are inside are those who took the pre admission course without going through any professional exams. How credible is this cert? Lol. I can bet if you ask the existing CA holders to take the exams to renew the licence almost everyone will let go of this "CA qualification".
Today 02:45 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
I am SCAQ candidate.

If next time I want to go Scotland be PA via RMA, must I study the Scotland tax system?
Of cos la. Ask u go jh land u also cant do tax.

Btw they come out with clown policies again. Wooo hhaaa woo haa so long summarized in 3 lame points LOL.
Today 01:14 PM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
There is an identified difference between those who took pre admission course and those who took the scaq

1) the membership number difference. The new ones start with “0” while the old ones start with “7” or “8” series. So when employer ask for your membership cert, they can identify which scheme you were under.

2) the old ones not eligible for all the membership agreements with foreign professional bodies. So if you want work overseas you will have a problem.

as much as I also want to take the new one, it is not feasible for someone my age already.
I am SCAQ candidate.

If next time I want to go Scotland be PA via RMA, must I study the Scotland tax system?
Today 10:51 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
A decade old
But even you have to admit out of that decade, 4 years was basically a time skip arc.
Today 10:50 AM
Unregistered There is an identified difference between those who took pre admission course and those who took the scaq

1) the membership number difference. The new ones start with “0” while the old ones start with “7” or “8” series. So when employer ask for your membership cert, they can identify which scheme you were under.

2) the old ones not eligible for all the membership agreements with foreign professional bodies. So if you want work overseas you will have a problem.

as much as I also want to take the new one, it is not feasible for someone my age already.
Today 10:50 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
To me 2013 was just a few years ago so it feels quite weird to hear people call it the OLD.

It’s not that we are OLD, it’s that you are YOUNG.
A decade old
Today 10:45 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Shiok lor

5-days workshop right?

CEO Fann Kor herself admit she is a 5-days workshop CA as compare to "5 x SCAQ paper ATO CA".
Majority took the 5 days weekday option if their company sponsor study leave.

If like me didn’t get sponsored leave, we have to take the WEEKEND option which was 4 Sundays I remember.
Today 10:43 AM
Unregistered To me 2013 was just a few years ago so it feels quite weird to hear people call it the OLD.

It’s not that we are OLD, it’s that you are YOUNG.
Today 05:27 AM
Unregistered
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
There have been complaints from NTU, NUS, and SMU graduates regarding exemptions for CPA Australia members. However, ISCA seems to be addressing these concerns by introducing an Accelerated Pathway. Under this program, current undergraduate students from these universities can start tackling ISCA SCAQ papers early, completing two during their university years and then being exempted from two more upon starting work. This essentially means they only need to complete one Capstone paper after graduation, leveling the playing field for all.

ISCA's CEO, Fann Kor, acknowledges the challenges of balancing work and studies, which is why the Accelerated Pathway has been introduced. This initiative aims to streamline the qualification process, with future local graduates, CPA Australia, and possibly ACCA members all just needing to complete one Capstone exam.

However, there's still a discrepancy for graduates between 2013 and 2023 who must complete five papers under the old system. But they can benefit from exemptions, reducing their workload to just three papers.

In an effort to attract more members, ISCA should consider reverting to the old system of a five-day workshop and three years of experience, which would accommodate local graduates, ACCA, and CPA Australia members.

There are also discussions about the necessity of the ATO requirement, especially for companies where the finance department is not a significant part of operations.

While ISCA has signed RMAs and MRA with various international bodies, some of these agreements seem less practical, as professionals are unlikely to relocate due to tax system differences.

The recent introduction of the Accelerated Pathway seems to contradict ISCA's previous rules set in 2013, which required candidates to work full-time while studying for the SCAQ. This change allows undergraduates to complete two SCAQ papers during their university years, suggesting a shift in ISCA's approach.

In essence, ISCA is undergoing significant changes to its qualification process, aiming to accommodate a wider range of candidates while also addressing previous criticisms and challenges.
This is wad happen when sub par performance hold the board.
No vision no meaning benefit to the industry or profession. Keep making u turn. Might as well go back pre 2013. Come on la. See isca annual report i laugh till faint.
Sg should just be sg, dont try to be funny go compare with other global bodies. So greedy and no logic. Imagine im in uk take scaq for what f...
.accountancy should act like accountancy. Need expert from a jurisdiction go find the ca there, dont try to be funny.
This thread has more than 10 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT +8. The time now is 05:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2