Quote:
A stranger elderly couple who just happen to bump into you during a stroll in the same condo will tell you all the details about their assets, investments, passive income, working salary & their savings during a casual chit chat. Yea rite. Seriously. |
Quote:
|
31 years old.
earning about 100-110k per year in IT line. |
Quote:
|
Remisier
less than 2yrs $242K++ Helped my clients earned alot of money and along the way, myself too...interested to invest and trade, please contact me at [email protected]'s wishing all forumers a great 2013 ahead! Huat ah!!! ;-) |
simple life
56 yrs old, retired liao. No active income.
Wife, also 56, still working, 120K pa. Passive income : 1. 30K dividend (fluctuate) 2. 40 K rental (gross) 3. 28K CPF interest (combined with wife) Switched to lower gear, enjoy simple life. |
age: 26
race: chinese Height: 1.75 Weight: 70kg Pay: 35k p.a Bonus: 0 education: nus Assets: iphone 5 (white 16g) |
MOM Report on Wages in Singapore 2011
http://www.mom.gov.sg/Documents/stat...sd_2011ROW.pdf
Page 129 30 - 39 Years (Basic Wage) Chemical engineer 6,097 Civil engineer 3,980 Electrical engineer 3,900 Electronics engineer 3,850 Industrial and production engineer 3,650 Industrial safety engineer 4,635 Mechanical engineer 3,536 Network/ Infrastructure architect and engineer 4,300 Petroleum/ Natural gas engineer 3,690 |
Thanks for sharing your story, welcome to the forum.
Don't be irritated by the 1 or 2 trolls in this forum, they are truly a nuisance that unfortunately have lots of spare time on their hands. I think every Singaporean aspires to having a nice passive retirement income like the retirees you met, but it is becoming more and more difficult for the younger ones to do so due to global money printing leading to asset inflation. This of course leads to displeasure against the ruling party. As the elections come round again I think we will likely see maximal efforts in cooling measures for property and increasing welfare to help the lower and middle class so as to bolster their election chances. Even with this, the results will be unlikely to improve much for the PAP. What we may then see is more seats falling to the opposition which will more than likely lead to the US style paralyzed A vs B government that will be unable to move forward with unpopular but necessary policies. We will probably have parliament stuck discussing computer system companies (to cite an example) rather than important issues like our graying population or low birth rate. Perhaps that may be the beginning of the end of Singapore's prosperity, if we take a (very) pessimistic view. Anyway, Happy New Year 2013 to you too! Quote:
|
Quote:
I would rather them sort things out in Parliament through rigorous debate rather than degenerate into a rubber stamp institution. Wouldn't you have wished this was the case when the treasonous FT policy and housing supply bills were "discussed" in Parliament >10years ago? The AIM saga might have little to do with typical apathetic Singaporean lives but if you constantly allow the white lords to get away with doing anything they want to this island we're not going to progress much either. We're already getting our jobs robbed from us, our transport overwhelmed and our public flats invaded. I can't see anything worse/better than our current situation. |
All times are GMT +8. The time now is 01:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2