Originally Posted by Unregistered

just another slight deviation -

darinne ko was not being unethical. if you even bothered reading the judgment (in which the accused prof was acquitted in the end), she came off more as an inexperienced, hapless 19/20 year old girl in love.. which was exactly what the court concluded anyway. also, as the other poster mentioned - if she was being unethical to the point of bringing disrepute to the profession, she would have hauled ass to the disciplinary tribunal and gotten disbarred.

tl;dr: OP is clearly not a lawyer nor from the legal industry. your opinions are therefore irrelevant.