Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
If they slack off and fall short of expectations, then put them on performance review for their appointment. If they still can't meet expectations, have them step down.
For as long as they are meeting expectations, they should be paid at their establishment grade. It's called estab grade for a reason.
|
Exactly.
The implementation is completely broken.
SEO grades by design, are not permanent grades. Officers have to relinquish their SEO grade when they step down from their appointments.
If SEOs are expected to be KPs, with KRAs written based on paygrades as opposed to appointments, it would make sense to expect the reverse too, where KPs should be SEOs.
Don't really see what's the big fuss with promoting people directly to SEO. Especially with the addition of GEO5A, it shows that the system does allow for skipping of grades.
If someone after being appointed as KP, is not performing up to the KRAs expected for that role, then penalise them during performance reviews. That's the whole purpose of having a performance appraisal system in the first place right?
Elsewhere, barring the short window during probation, there is no such nonsense.
Paygrade and appointments are basically pegged to each other.
Otherwise, they should review the KRAs expected for different paygrades.