Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
I find it hard to believe that they will go to such lengths. It will foster so much discontent especially amongst the in-house community. I hope it’s only posturing.
Has anyone successfully applied for a waiver of membership fees before? The grounds are quite narrow.
|
It’s a lawful debt.
They’ve already gone to the lengths of sending letters of demand.
SILE fostered so much discontent amongst the Part B candidates too, but the power imbalance means they can’t do much about it.
The same applies here with SAL and in-house practitioners. Discontent is the least of their worries. SAL has even more to lose with the Auditor-General lurking at the sidelines. SAL has a duty to collect these debts.