Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
This is a good initiative. Kudos to the people who did it, although we need a crowdsourced way to verify this for factual accuracy. Hope that this can be expanded to the other mid-tier firms as well.
That said, I think we can do without the 'nature of work' and 'conclusion' sections. Those are too generic to be useful since these factors are very team and department dependent. And not the least because it sounds like it was written by ChatGPT.
|
Lawyers can probably email them and keep them updated, or comment on the accuracy here since it seems they are sourcing data from this forum.
Nevertheless, it seems very useful and saves people from having to read many of the degenerative comments on this forum.