Originally Posted by Unregistered

Reading the main article carefully, one can see that WongP got 13 categories, just one less than A&G and CNP, which probably went all out to get votes. Surely WongP didn’t even try, or else they would have done better. But they would rather expend energy on more worthy directories like IFLR as you have rightly pointed out. That WongP is one of the Big Five is surely not debatable.