Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Regarding point 2 about sharing how a JH has performed compared to the other officers in the same subgrade, I would advise you against doing so. Focus on your officer and the impact of his/ her work instead. I dislike hearing statements made by RO saying one has done well, but not as well as the others. It creates unnecessary/unwanted rilvary and negative feelings among colleagues.
|
But that IS the whole point about ranking isn’t it? And it sucks. It compares people ie same thing as bell curve! The whole ranking thing DOES make teaching toxic and put people against each other. Hence all the extra projects etc to make sure you ‘shine’ against others.
They want to make it fair then just like supposedly national exams, give PB by specific defined criteria….not have a ‘suggested’ 5% D grade which SLs actually follow to the t. That’s the worst thing…I know of people getting ‘technical D’ ie they didn’t get D initially but since they pushed to the bottom it becomes a technical D to suit the quota.