This is as good as saying, when my market peers earn much more than me when we were both MX 12 equivalent. Then when we both promoted to MX 11-equivalent, i managed to bridge that gap considerably (zhun bo?!), and only for my peer to pull that gap wide apart again when we both promoted to MX11A-equivalent. This does not make sense. CS is know for its rather fixed and flat MI and promo increment. The gap between CS and market equivalent, in my opinion, is unlikely to fluctuate so drastically. If there is a gap at the lower grade, one would expect the gap to be widened as the grade goes up. I am skeptical. Is the gap for 11- equivalent accurate??