Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered
Why is MOE using a policy of low salary growth and slow advancement at the entry/lower grades to encourage higher attrition rates? Shouldn't they be trying to encourage attrition at the higher grades e.g. GEO5 ceiling HOTs that are too comfortable to leave? Instead young teachers including expensive scholars are resigning once they complete their bonds and getting 20-30% pay bumps outside.
If the objective is to remove so-called dead weight, the current measures are not effective at all. They are losing more of the wrong demographic. |
"Deadweights" do not belong to a certain demographics.
MOE could have increased class sizes and solved a lot of problems with one policy. Instead
MOE chose to merge many schools and start new ones. Go figure.